Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: Umbrel – A personal server OS for self-hosting

umbrel.com

21–30 of 140 posts

Re: Show HN: Umbrel – A personal server OS for self-hosting

#21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Licensing is a nuanced subject so we've written a detailed post on it. But in short, our license grants you the same rights that come with an open source license, except the right to sell or commercialize Umbrel. Here's our post that explains our licensing in detail: https://blog.getumbrel.com/everything-you-need-to-know-about...

Except it denies me the right to purchase support services from the vendor of my choosing. It also denies me the ability to hire a contractor of my choosing to create a derivative of the product or even contribute changes to the product. It further denies me the ability to receive sponsorship from another individual to create a derivative work (This falls under commercializing, but the other two would not be me doing…

[deleted]

Re: Show HN: Umbrel – A personal server OS for self-hosting

#23

I think the overlap of folks who want to self host and folks who don't already use a preferred Linux distro or Windows is quite small.

If self hosting were as easy and stable as signing up for a cloud service, I think people would switch

Re: Show HN: Umbrel – A personal server OS for self-hosting

#25
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Licensing is a nuanced subject so we've written a detailed post on it. But in short, our license grants you the same rights that come with an open source license, except the right to sell or commercialize Umbrel. Here's our post that explains our licensing in detail: https://blog.getumbrel.com/everything-you-need-to-know-about...

No, it's not Open Source. It's a perfectly justifiable decision, but it's not Open Source, nor is it equivalent. Yes, your license means that individual users can make little patches to customize the product to their needs, and even share these customizations with other users. That's great! But the license effectively prohibits borrowing code from your codebase for use in other projects, meaning your code does not be…

Thanks for the insightful reply. Everything you said makes total sense.

Re noncommercial organizations being permitted users, this was a conscious decision on our part. We're purposefully building Umbrel purely for consumers, and don't plan to serve any commercial or noncommercial organizations. We want to align our incentives directly with consumers instead of enterprises, and this is purely to help us focus on building for the user-base that excites us the most.

I'm a big fan of Sandstorm btw. It was way ahead of its time.

Re: Show HN: Umbrel – A personal server OS for self-hosting

#26

I think the overlap of folks who want to self host and folks who don't already use a preferred Linux distro or Windows is quite small.

That’s a fair point, but there are lots of people who want one less thing to manage - the underlying infrastructure is a large piece to offload from the mental load of self hosting.

Re: Show HN: Umbrel – A personal server OS for self-hosting

#28
post #22

At this point, any marketing copy using the word “beautiful” is a major turn-off for me.

Pretty sure I'm in the minority of HN folks, but I'm a fan of tools/OS'es/whatever that make a concerted effort to follow design trends and present a modern-looking UX.

Re: Show HN: Umbrel – A personal server OS for self-hosting

#29

I think the overlap of folks who want to self host and folks who don't already use a preferred Linux distro or Windows is quite small.

If self hosting were as easy and stable as signing up for a cloud service, I think people would switch

How do you suppose that would happen? You need some kind of hardware to self-host.

Re: Show HN: Umbrel – A personal server OS for self-hosting

#30
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Licensing is a nuanced subject so we've written a detailed post on it. But in short, our license grants you the same rights that come with an open source license, except the right to sell or commercialize Umbrel. Here's our post that explains our licensing in detail: https://blog.getumbrel.com/everything-you-need-to-know-about...

No, it's not Open Source. It's a perfectly justifiable decision, but it's not Open Source, nor is it equivalent. Yes, your license means that individual users can make little patches to customize the product to their needs, and even share these customizations with other users. That's great! But the license effectively prohibits borrowing code from your codebase for use in other projects, meaning your code does not be…

> It's a perfectly justifiable decision...

Especially when one of the VC firms that funds your project is also the one behind formulation of the PolyForm set of licenses, I'd imagine. At least, PolyForm is better, in some sense, than fully closed source projects built atop other MIT/BSD/Apache licensed projects (say, the V8 JavaScript engine ;), and never shared.

The only reason I dislike non-OSI approved licenses are, the "users" of such licenses want to have their cake and eat it too: As in, they want to project open source ethos while also denying the advantages/rights otherwise afforded by Open Source, as defined by the OSI.

Imo, source-available licenses are justified only when companies using it are honest about their intentions and forthcoming about the license's limitations. Nothing specific on Umbrel, but generally, misdirection by firms insistent on source-available licenses as being some convenient 'middle-ground' is off-putting, to say the least!

I've followed Umbrel since I first stumbled upon it in August 2020, and of course, I'd have liked them to be open-source (since I don't believe software is their core advantage, rather their brand is; but then again, what do I know): https://github.com/getumbrel/umbrel/issues/291#issuecomment-...

That said, Umbrel already brings a lot to the table... its licensing is a predictable HN distraction from discussion on its true potential.

Post reply on HN