kdig anyone?
Show HN: "q", a DNS query tool with support for UDP, TCP, DoT, DoH, DoQ and ODoH
21–30 of 46 posts
Re: Show HN: "q", a DNS query tool with support for UDP, TCP, DoT, DoH, DoQ and ODoH
#229k stars and 5yrs old: https://github.com/harelba/q Why not call it like dnsq or dq like jq ( https://stedolan.github.io/jq/ ) did?
There's already a thing called `dnsq`, it's part of the djbdns suite (along with dnsqr for recursive queries).
I actually miss it, now that pretty much all of djb's tools have fallen out of both fashion and maintenance, it was a much better -- and simpler -- tool than dig or nslookup.
Re: Show HN: "q", a DNS query tool with support for UDP, TCP, DoT, DoH, DoQ and ODoH
#23See also "dog" which I've been using for a while, works well. https://github.com/ogham/dog I actually already have a "q" alias, I think single-letter aliases are probably quite common. Are there many other well-known utilities with a single-letter name? Edit: Turns out I have one installed, "z", a universal archiver front-end. https://legacy.cs.indiana.edu/~kinzler/z/
I have n, a node version manager.
Re: Show HN: "q", a DNS query tool with support for UDP, TCP, DoT, DoH, DoQ and ODoH
#24can you PLEASE use a longer word? this is hard to google and bad in an environment. everyone can abbreviate it with their shell if they want to.
at least the go people started calling the language golang. for heavens sake.
Re: Show HN: "q", a DNS query tool with support for UDP, TCP, DoT, DoH, DoQ and ODoH
#25Nice, given `dog` seems to be stalled.
Why `q` over `doggo` btw?
Re: Show HN: "q", a DNS query tool with support for UDP, TCP, DoT, DoH, DoQ and ODoH
#26See also "dog" which I've been using for a while, works well. https://github.com/ogham/dog I actually already have a "q" alias, I think single-letter aliases are probably quite common. Are there many other well-known utilities with a single-letter name? Edit: Turns out I have one installed, "z", a universal archiver front-end. https://legacy.cs.indiana.edu/~kinzler/z/
X
Re: Show HN: "q", a DNS query tool with support for UDP, TCP, DoT, DoH, DoQ and ODoH
#27See also "dog" which I've been using for a while, works well. https://github.com/ogham/dog I actually already have a "q" alias, I think single-letter aliases are probably quite common. Are there many other well-known utilities with a single-letter name? Edit: Turns out I have one installed, "z", a universal archiver front-end. https://legacy.cs.indiana.edu/~kinzler/z/
I use doggo, a better version written in Go: https://github.com/mr-karan/doggo
Re: Show HN: "q", a DNS query tool with support for UDP, TCP, DoT, DoH, DoQ and ODoH
#28Nice, given `dog` seems to be stalled. Why `q` over `doggo` btw?
There's already https://github.com/mr-karan/doggo
Re: Show HN: "q", a DNS query tool with support for UDP, TCP, DoT, DoH, DoQ and ODoH
#29No support for dnscrypt, anonymized DNS and the ability to directly enter DNS stamps?
Re: Show HN: "q", a DNS query tool with support for UDP, TCP, DoT, DoH, DoQ and ODoH
#30See also "dog" which I've been using for a while, works well. https://github.com/ogham/dog I actually already have a "q" alias, I think single-letter aliases are probably quite common. Are there many other well-known utilities with a single-letter name? Edit: Turns out I have one installed, "z", a universal archiver front-end. https://legacy.cs.indiana.edu/~kinzler/z/
> Are there many other well-known utilities with a single-letter name? There is a `w` command. It's kind of like a mix of `who` and `uptime`. https://linux.die.net/man/1/w
The `w` command is more of a `what` instead of `who`.