Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: Remote Jobs (our answer to "Who Is Hiring Remote Workers?")

remote-jobs.com

21–30 of 86 posts

Re: Show HN: Remote Jobs (our answer to "Who Is Hiring Remote Workers?")

#21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

As a now country-side based programmer, I will definitely use your site :) Thanks!

Oh? Where are you? Would love to chat about Ruby nerdery sometime when we may be in the same place.

I'm in a rural area in west of France :) http://bit.ly/fEjBxk

Re: Show HN: Remote Jobs (our answer to "Who Is Hiring Remote Workers?")

#23
post #7

charging before you have mass adoption is a recipe for disaster...you should wait until you have mass adoption then make a premium listing and charge for that. As it stands now, you'll have a dozen or so jobs, interest will fade, and employers will stop posting when they get few resumes

That's a really interesting point. Our concern with free listings was a flood of poor content, which would hide the good ones.

Then maybe your solution is one that ensures the good ones rise to the top?

Re: Show HN: Remote Jobs (our answer to "Who Is Hiring Remote Workers?")

#24
post #17
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sorry, I respectfully disagree. If the market will bear it, you can charge for a service before "mass adoption"

not when the service suffers from a chicken and egg problem. Why would someone pay money to list their job on a site with no traffic? Why would someone go to a site like that if you only have a dozen jobs? This can be something good...but they are shooting it in the leg by being greedy

To be clear, greed certainly isn't our intent. As Dave (djbrowning) wrote, we're concerned about the quality of the content on the site.

We're also giving away coupon codes right now (see my post below) to drive job posters to the site.

Re: Show HN: Remote Jobs (our answer to "Who Is Hiring Remote Workers?")

#26
post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's a really interesting point. Our concern with free listings was a flood of poor content, which would hide the good ones.

that's a good problem to have...that means you are actually popular enough for people to exploit....then you can introduce the paid pricing. for now you can easily moderate postings yourself.

That's a good point. Thanks.

Re: Show HN: Remote Jobs (our answer to "Who Is Hiring Remote Workers?")

#27
post #17
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sorry, I respectfully disagree. If the market will bear it, you can charge for a service before "mass adoption"

not when the service suffers from a chicken and egg problem. Why would someone pay money to list their job on a site with no traffic? Why would someone go to a site like that if you only have a dozen jobs? This can be something good...but they are shooting it in the leg by being greedy

The typical employer expects to pay to post a job listing. Yes more traffic is better, but I bet this site will start getting major traffic within a month. Being a specific niche I also predict it will get some major google SEO juice before to long. So that egg better start running or the chicken will catch up!

Re: Show HN: Remote Jobs (our answer to "Who Is Hiring Remote Workers?")

#28
post #17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

not when the service suffers from a chicken and egg problem. Why would someone pay money to list their job on a site with no traffic? Why would someone go to a site like that if you only have a dozen jobs? This can be something good...but they are shooting it in the leg by being greedy

To be clear, greed certainly isn't our intent. As Dave (djbrowning) wrote, we're concerned about the quality of the content on the site. We're also giving away coupon codes right now (see my post below) to drive job posters to the site.

What about manual approval until the site has momentum?

Re: Show HN: Remote Jobs (our answer to "Who Is Hiring Remote Workers?")

#29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Oh? Where are you? Would love to chat about Ruby nerdery sometime when we may be in the same place.

I'm in a rural area in west of France :) http://bit.ly/fEjBxk

Oops misunderstood your use of "country". You meant "rural" -- like me. ;)

Re: Show HN: Remote Jobs (our answer to "Who Is Hiring Remote Workers?")

#30
post #17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

not when the service suffers from a chicken and egg problem. Why would someone pay money to list their job on a site with no traffic? Why would someone go to a site like that if you only have a dozen jobs? This can be something good...but they are shooting it in the leg by being greedy

To be clear, greed certainly isn't our intent. As Dave (djbrowning) wrote, we're concerned about the quality of the content on the site. We're also giving away coupon codes right now (see my post below) to drive job posters to the site.

If quality was your only concern, you'd just charge a one time $5 fee. So I'd say greed is at least somewhat involved.

And yes giving away coupon codes is good and well...but then you run into the quality problem that you use as an excuse to charge from the start.

Don't get me wrong, there is nothing wrong with greed...provided it doesn't cause you to kill your business before it gets the chance to get off the ground.

Post reply on HN