Do you think the 1,600 journalists at The New York Times, many of whom work in difficult environments (including the White House, lol), should work for free? Quite the Scrooge move.
Show HN: A bookmarklet to remove clickgates on New York Times, Medium, etc.
21–30 of 54 posts
Re: Show HN: A bookmarklet to remove clickgates on New York Times, Medium, etc.
#22Do you think the 1,600 journalists at The New York Times, many of whom work in difficult environments (including the White House, lol), should work for free? Quite the Scrooge move.
I feel like, if PewDiePie can make 1 Million a month in youtube ad-revenue and 8 million total. A Newssite like NYT ought to be able to support their staff, thanks to a global reach and 240Million views per month.
Re: Show HN: A bookmarklet to remove clickgates on New York Times, Medium, etc.
#23I though people are paid for posting on medium?
They do, but you have to apply and be selected. Compared to all users, its a fraction. And everyone else gets pushed into the paywall, because medium basically says: "If you don't we will not promote it and your post will die in obscurity"
Re: Show HN: A bookmarklet to remove clickgates on New York Times, Medium, etc.
#24if you don't want to pay for them is fine, just don't read them
Re: Show HN: A bookmarklet to remove clickgates on New York Times, Medium, etc.
#25Earlier quoted context omitted.
I feel like, if PewDiePie can make 1 Million a month in youtube ad-revenue and 8 million total. A Newssite like NYT ought to be able to support their staff, thanks to a global reach and 240Million views per month.
8 million dollars over 1600 journalists is $5000 each. Pewdipie doesnt have the costs of running a news company and hes not in the news industry
Re: Show HN: A bookmarklet to remove clickgates on New York Times, Medium, etc.
#26Re: Show HN: A bookmarklet to remove clickgates on New York Times, Medium, etc.
#27Do you think the 1,600 journalists at The New York Times, many of whom work in difficult environments (including the White House, lol), should work for free? Quite the Scrooge move.
I'm happy to pay for content. I donate $10/mo to both Mother Jones and ProPublica. That's more for each than the cost of a New York Times subscription. Neither of these has a paywall. I'd prefer that they didn't have popovers either, but that's about as good as I can expect in the modern anti-privacy, anti-attention culture of the internet. I just don't feel obligated to pay for content that is sent to me without me ever agreeing to pay for it.
I also think search engines shouldn't index paywalled content, and that newsfeeds like HN or Reddit shouldn't allow links to paywalled content, and I consistently downvote paywalled content.
EDIT: I'm also going to start requesting that people not link to paywalled content when I see it, I think.
Re: Show HN: A bookmarklet to remove clickgates on New York Times, Medium, etc.
#28Earlier quoted context omitted.
They do, but you have to apply and be selected. Compared to all users, its a fraction. And everyone else gets pushed into the paywall, because medium basically says: "If you don't we will not promote it and your post will die in obscurity"
so medium is running a business? Did you apply and get turned away?
Re: Show HN: A bookmarklet to remove clickgates on New York Times, Medium, etc.
#29Re: Show HN: A bookmarklet to remove clickgates on New York Times, Medium, etc.
#30Earlier quoted context omitted.
They do, but you have to apply and be selected. Compared to all users, its a fraction. And everyone else gets pushed into the paywall, because medium basically says: "If you don't we will not promote it and your post will die in obscurity"
so medium is running a business? Did you apply and get turned away?
Has a bit of a bad taste for me.