Show HN: API Bootstrap – A better way to build your API
21–30 of 40 posts
Re: Show HN: API Bootstrap – A better way to build your API
#22The landing page doesn't provide any information what so ever about what your service solves. Only a madman would go further.
Re: Show HN: API Bootstrap – A better way to build your API
#23Re: Show HN: API Bootstrap – A better way to build your API
#24Making me sign in before you tell me anything is a non-starter.
Re: Show HN: API Bootstrap – A better way to build your API
#25The "It's so bad it's good" effect?
Re: Show HN: API Bootstrap – A better way to build your API
#261) allow non-json responses 2) why would I do pass-thru? for metrics? 3) add test data generation features for mock responses 4) add at least limited scripting features for both pass-thru and mock
Looks like a good start to me and I was not particularly bothered by the current sign up.
Re: Show HN: API Bootstrap – A better way to build your API
#27Re: Show HN: API Bootstrap – A better way to build your API
#28I'm wondering what all the upvotes are about? I've seen fairly decent "Show HN" submissions languish down in the 0-1 range while this one (which is being universally panned) is up to 17. The "It's so bad it's good" effect?
Re: Show HN: API Bootstrap – A better way to build your API
#29The landing page doesn't provide any information what so ever about what your service solves. Only a madman would go further.
Only a madman would start a 30-day trial without entering any financial information?
If you think about the customer journey as Research-Evaluate-Purchase, the 30 day free trial is the Evaluate stage. There isn't enough information (or any specifics) on the landing page to do any meaningful amount of research.
Re: Show HN: API Bootstrap – A better way to build your API
#30I'd put some time into showing some examples of what exactly the service is and how it works. What problem does it solve specifically?