Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: 288 Analog Clocks Give Digital Time

clocks.80limit.com

21–30 of 36 posts

Re: Show HN: 288 Analog Clocks Give Digital Time

#21
post #11

Why say "over 280" when you could just say 288?

I have no idea, the title changed after I posted it and it was "288". It was also originally a "Show HN:" but someone removed it (maybe I was using it wrong, I don't know).

We updated the title to “Over 280 Analog Clocks Give Digital Time”, but on second thought have put it back to the original.

Re: Show HN: 288 Analog Clocks Give Digital Time

#22

I'd love to see a version of this that didn't go through a "random" phase every few seconds. I'd love to see the actual transitions between the times. I think it would be more subtle, but more elegant. (You might be able to add seconds display to the clock if you wanted it to be more active.)

I was indeed afraid that it would look too static without using "random" phases. Using seconds would be great (I could try to make them look smaller too). Looking at my source of inspiration ( http://www.humanssince1982.com/a-million-times/ ) you can see that the random phases are way prettier than mine. But it would make the code uglier with a lot of "setTimeout"s, and I wanted to keep it clean.

Is it possible to make these scriptable? I think it would be fun to try and visualize magnetic field lines with these.

Also on the clock front, can you change it to segment the array into different digits. Then just do a full right hand rotation of the clocks in that segment untill they get to their correct possition?

So if you have to update the single minute digit only those clocks spin and they only spin to the right untill they fall into their correct possition. If you needed to update hours and minutes then all of the clocks would rotate to the right untill they fall into position.

Would be faster and I think it may look cool.

Re: Show HN: 288 Analog Clocks Give Digital Time

#24

It takes about 15 seconds for the clock to cycle. Only three of these seconds are spent actually showing the time. So if I want to know the time I need to sit and wait typically about 10 seconds before I'll know what time it is. It's cool, but it's upside down. It needs to be a clock first, then cool.

That depends on whether it's priority is to be a clock or a piece of art first. As an artwork, it more than succeeds. In it's current form, prioritizing art seems the correct choice. It takes up a fair chunk of screen real estate. It's the kind of thing you pop up for a bit and look at as a novelty. To be primarily a clock, it will need a more dedicated display. Even if that's just an LCD monitor connected to a Raspberry PI.

Re: Show HN: 288 Analog Clocks Give Digital Time

#26
post #25

Those aren't analog clocks. Analog clocks don't have a state where both hands of the clock are horizontal, or where one is pointing south and the other pointing east or west.

They're not even clocks, in that they don't individually keep time. But that's not the point, is it. I think it's a nice project.

Re: Show HN: 288 Analog Clocks Give Digital Time

#27
post #25

Those aren't analog clocks. Analog clocks don't have a state where both hands of the clock are horizontal, or where one is pointing south and the other pointing east or west.

It is if you allow for rotation of the hands as well as rotating the entire clock itself. If a clock showing 6:00 is rotated 90 degrees you get horizontal hands. Similarly for rotating a clock that shows 3:00 or 9:00.
Post reply on HN