What about reverse search? I want to find a work close to home. :)
Show HN: Find a home close to work
21–30 of 68 posts
Re: Show HN: Find a home close to work
#22Another website that does not works without sessionStorage enabled.
Re: Show HN: Find a home close to work
#23The rent explosion article[0] seems relevant. No 1 bedroom apartments for less than $3000 near my San Mateo office. [0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10050545
Re: Show HN: Find a home close to work
#24Very interesting. The site looks clean and it's fast. Where do you get your data? I used to work for one of the industry dinosaurs; our only competitive advantage was that we had agreements with most of the 674 MLSes to rehost their data for our clients, which were RE Agent companies. Zillow is still using Trulia as a pipe to funnel that MLS data from my former employer. Is that one of the reasons for piloting in CA…
As a California RE brokerage we join each MLS and get a direct feed from their RETS api. It's a dramatically better data feed than any of the aggregators offer and we get listings the minute they come on market (well our polling interval is more like 5 minutes). So far we have 100% coverage in San Francisco, Oakland/East Bay, Silicon Valley, and Los Angeles. We've just joined the San Diego MLS and will have data ther…
Re: Show HN: Find a home close to work
#25Curious where this number comes from: > It’s sad. The typical car LA or SF commuter spends more than 60 hours each year stuck in traffic. It seems low, it would be an estimate of just over one hour per week, which would be like 10 minutes each morning and evening.
Maybe it's not the whole time commuting, but the time added due to rush hour traffic?
Re: Show HN: Find a home close to work
#26Earlier quoted context omitted.
The average commute in the US is something like 23 min, so the average commute in LA or SF should theoretically be a bit higher. I agree that 10 min seems incredibly low.
Good catch, I'll fact check that number.
At that rate, though, you save something closer to a hundred hours a year, or more than two work weeks.
Re: Show HN: Find a home close to work
#27Hey HN, I'm a founder at Open Listings and did a lot of the engineering of this project. We got a lot of inquiries from tech workers who really cared about their commute times, so we used Googles Distance Matrix API [0] to sort listings by commute time. I'll be on here with my cofounders today to answer any questions you might have. [0]: https://developers.google.com/maps/documentation/distancemat...
But seriously, it is a very neat tool, thanks for making it.
Re: Show HN: Find a home close to work
#28The site is very nice, but how does anyone afford houses that expensive in those areas? I live in Texas and my nice modern 2000 SF house is only $190.
Salaries are higher here for one. Say $190k vs 4x as much, $760k. Assuming magic 10% down appears in your pocket, 0% property tax, ignore the differences in state/local taxes, and assume a spherical chicken in a vacuum.... $3200/mo vs $800/mo.
4 times as much! Wow! That's a lot of money. Right? Except.. it's "only" $29k/yr. Most cost-of-living expenses don't scale with income. Now, of course, your salary has to be more than that to cover taxes, but say 20% overall tax rate, you really only need $36k more per year, which you might see straight up on a single salary, based on cost-of-living pay adjustment alone. If you're married, suddenly you only have to make $18k per person per year more.
If you follow the "1/3 of your salary" rule, it would suggest that you need to make $86,400 per year more, which is why expensive housing sounds so expensive. One would hope that in a low cost-of-housing market, you're not spending 1/3 of your income on your housing, because then you really don't have a lot of money left over for retirement or food or entertainment. Similarly, in a higher cost-of-living market, you might fudge that a bit and pay more than 1/3 of your salary, which still leaves you more money for your 401k and transportation and entertainment, and all those things that really don't scale with cost of living much at all.
You could also look at the high cost of living as a savings plan. As long as you retire before whatever particular housing cycle bubble bursts, you can still retire to Texas (or wherever) -- you can just do so with more money (equity, savings, retirement plan, etc).
Also, some tax and expense treatment of housing is pretty regressive. You're probably not getting a mortgage interest/property tax income tax deduction on a cheap mortgage; on a more expensive one you are, so you're immediately paying a lower effective interest rate and property tax rate (if you want to look at it that way). You're not paying PMI for that sub-20% down payment because it's not federally backed. etc.
This is not to say it's cheap, or easy, or affordable for everyone, or even smart. It's just saying how it's possible, and how it's probably not as bad as it sounds.
Re: Show HN: Find a home close to work
#29The site is very nice, but how does anyone afford houses that expensive in those areas? I live in Texas and my nice modern 2000 SF house is only $190.
I bet that if and when this site begins targeting the other 99% of companies, the listings for those will trend lower to reflect the average salaries.
Re: Show HN: Find a home close to work
#30The site is very nice, but how does anyone afford houses that expensive in those areas? I live in Texas and my nice modern 2000 SF house is only $190.
One of my coworkers who started at the same time as me lived in a 3BR with two roommates for the same period of time, so he was paying half what I was in rent. He still lives modestly (2BR, working wife, no kids) and probably could retire anytime he wants now.