Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: Open-sourcing my wedding website on my first anniversary

github.com

191–200 of 208 posts

Re: Show HN: Open-sourcing my wedding website on my first anniversary

#191
post #67

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The package.json declares 4 build dependencies and 3 runtime. Most of that bloat probably comes from Gulp, which is one of the most ridiculously bloated tools I've ever seen.

What is the alternative to tools like Gulp or Gatsby for those of us who want to make (fairly)simple websites? In my case, I’m a Data Scientist looking to make a portfolio website. Nothing too crazy but more than hello world. Should we just work with HTML? Materialize CSS? GitHub pages w/ Jekyll? Nextjs? Bootstrap? Should we just head back to Wordpress and Wix? Wixcode? Is Gulp the best option? Is it worth paying a p…

> What is the alternative to tools like Gulp or Gatsby for those of us who want to make (fairly)simple websites?

Gulp has nothing directly to do with building a website, it is a compilation tool of sorts that allows you to transform your source files into something you'll end up deploying via various plugins. For example, you can use gulp to collapse all your JS source files into one or to transpile it into something more cross browser compatible.

The reason I dislike Gulp is that it has a massive number of dependencies and really is just an overcomplicated reimplementation of pipes. Personally, I prefer Webpack. It is also a fairly large tool, but at the very least it actually does something useful out of the box. When I migrated our projects from Gulp to Webpack, I replaced a over 500 lines of gulp code with about 50 lines of config and a small bash script.

Re: Show HN: Open-sourcing my wedding website on my first anniversary

#192

Earlier quoted context omitted.

As others have said, in the US the formal paper invite is considered official. When my wife and I married we still did this but we encouraged people to RSVP via the website or email. No sense in sending more paper. It’s sad to me that we felt so pressured to do the paper invites. They’re ridiculously overpriced and all of that paper and emissions for delivery for something that can easily be delivered electronically…

Looks like the CO2 emissions of sending a letter are 25 grams or so. Meanwhile, an email with a 1 MB attachment is estimated to emit 19 grams of CO2 [1]. I think the real numbers might be off by a factor of 3 or more - there are so many variables: opening the email on a desktop PC and watching a video and sending it to friends would use much more, and maybe you mail the invitation to someone who doesn't get much mail…

Not to derail, but that estimate for carbon footprint of email seems extremely high. I believe your link is referencing a 2010 book's figures [1], which A. surely have declined in 8 years and B. seem suspect, given Netflix's 2014 claims of 300g avg yearly carbon impact per customer.

1 - https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2017/01/25...

Re: Show HN: Open-sourcing my wedding website on my first anniversary

#193

Ok feel old. 20.5 years ago I sent out a link to a party celebrating our engagement. I spent more time explaining how to get to the website, than people finding website helpful. Still married - so get off my lawn :)

I got married almost 3 years ago and wanted to do the same but i would have end up like you. Printing is expensive! For my Bachelorette party I send an image as invitation by WhatsApp.

Re: Show HN: Open-sourcing my wedding website on my first anniversary

#194

I’ve got a different format - timeline style: https://www.09092018.com Let me know if anyone wants me to open source this :)

This is a beautifully designed site. It manages to tell a coherent narrative in such an engaging way. It’s lovely!

It made me smile to see your wedding venue. It’s a lovely place.

Re: Show HN: Open-sourcing my wedding website on my first anniversary

#196
post #185

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It is a policy violation or it isn't. You can't have it both ways because of sympathy confusion. At any rate, it doesn't matter. A moderator has already interjected.

Why not just err on the side of sympathy? It's not hard, and what little information is lost that way doesn't matter so much.

I live in a world where the best of intentions is often responsible for entitlement and cataclysmic policy decisions. This has shaped the mode of thought amongst myself and my peers to what we call: bottom line up front, which is a cruel form of honesty. I appreciate that not everybody can encounter such thought forming experiences, but you are correct. The nature of deferring towards sympathy is the hardest challenge people in my circumstance face in adjusting from one world to another when the adjustment is required.

Re: Show HN: Open-sourcing my wedding website on my first anniversary

#199

I’ve got a different format - timeline style: https://www.09092018.com Let me know if anyone wants me to open source this :)

It would be awesome if you could open source this!

It's already, IMO you hadn't paid attention to the Title of Post.

Re: Show HN: Open-sourcing my wedding website on my first anniversary

#200
post #142

How does the "RSVP to google sheets" work? That's an extremely useful feature to have on a static site with no backend. It looks like it's related to this line: $.post(' https://script.google.com/macros/s/AKfycbzUqz44wOat0DiGjRV1g... , data) ... how does the security work on that, or can I RSVP to your wedding too?

Yes, I found it extremely helpful too. You can only RSVP if you have the invite code. If you don't then you can't RSVP. You can store the code in a particular box in the sheet and then your google script can validate the code entered by the guest.

You are checking the invite code in the browser side js. That doesn't keep any tech-savvy user from registering even without code. Is this correct?
Post reply on HN