Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: Stop paying for Dropbox/Google Drive, use your own S3 bucket instead

locker.dev

181–190 of 219 posts

Re: Show HN: Stop paying for Dropbox/Google Drive, use your own S3 bucket instead

#181
> Languages JavaScript 55.2%, TypeScript 44.4%, Other 0.4%

Isn't that compromises the whole purpose of the project immediatly?

Moreover, any reasonably adequate dev would work on expansion of syncthing ecosystem, not inventing a rasclet instead of a wheel

Re: Show HN: Stop paying for Dropbox/Google Drive, use your own S3 bucket instead

#182
There was a similar program I used when I was working at a smaller company and built an automated backup system for their call center recordings. It basically mapped the S3 bucket to a Windows drive letter, since the PBX call recording software was running on a Windows server. It was a while ago so I can't recall the name of the program

Re: Show HN: Stop paying for Dropbox/Google Drive, use your own S3 bucket instead

#183
post #170

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What experience?

A recent (last year?) Windows update moved a lot of people's Documents folder into OneDrive, without asking. In some cases people lost data, in others it was a nuisance as all sorts of embedded or saved paths broke.

> A recent (last year?) Windows update moved a lot of people's Documents folder into OneDrive, without asking.

Something similar happened to my Dropbox on Mac: the change to the macOS File Provider API meant that a lot of my locally synced files became cloud-sync only. Not cool when I was expecting limited internet access.

I still have no idea how to redownload and keep everything local while synced with cloud.

Re: Show HN: Stop paying for Dropbox/Google Drive, use your own S3 bucket instead

#184

Neat! Pricing wise it might not always make sense though to use the commercial blob storages, especially for solo usage. 1 TB is roughly 20-30 USD per month at AWS/GCP only in storage, plus traffic and operations. R2 is slightly cheaper and includes traffic. Compared to e.g a Google AI plan where you get 5 TB storage for the same price (25 USD/month) + Gemini Pro thrown in.

Backblaze is a lot more affordable

If only they had data centres in Asia so latency would be better for me.

Re: Show HN: Stop paying for Dropbox/Google Drive, use your own S3 bucket instead

#185
post #106

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Every so often someone is like, Dropbox isn’t that hard. Look at this amazing ZFS/whatever! So simple. Yeah, I keep paying Dropbox every year so I don’t have to think about it. I shoot a sync off to backblaze every once in a while.

I dislike Dropbox for reasons that aren't technical, but the big thing for me is that I want either E2EE, or control/ownership of where my data is stored. These are my personal files (no, not that kind of personal), I'm not just going to scatter them on the internet. My solution so far has been NextCloud, but I'm getting pretty fed up with it. But not enough to actually do anything about it... yet.

> I dislike Dropbox for reasons that aren't technical, but the big thing for me is that I want either E2EE, or control/ownership of where my data is stored.

You could run something like Cryptomator on top of Dropbox:

https://cryptomator.org/

It even has (paid) iOS and Android apps for mobile access.

Re: Show HN: Stop paying for Dropbox/Google Drive, use your own S3 bucket instead

#186
post #133
post #107

Why wouldn't I trust a vibe coded app that has existed for 1 week with all my important data?

In fairness, you can also have that experience with Microsoft OneDrive.

In absolute terms, as far as we know, as of today that vibe-coded app is still more reliable than OneDrive.

Re: Show HN: Stop paying for Dropbox/Google Drive, use your own S3 bucket instead

#187

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There, designed especially for you. Don't thank me, I'm a cardboard security expert, can do that all day long. https://fev.al/assets/2026/Carboard-bank-secure-box-template...

not picking on you, specifically, but i wonder how many people could roughly draw a cardboard box template correctly. It is an easier object than a bicycle, which people routinely have issues drawing, too. generally, there's not "missing pieces" in a cardboard box.

Fair, that template resolves to a box but it's missing stuff like tabs to make the bottom properly stick ; and it's probably not optimal in its use of cardboard. Also it was design in a minute in draw.io to make a stranger on the internet chuckle, so lots of constraints to fulfill.

Re: Show HN: Stop paying for Dropbox/Google Drive, use your own S3 bucket instead

#188
If you are not ready to trust a vibe-coded app with all your digital life, I recommend Filestash[1], easy to install self-hosted frontend for virtually any type of storage. Written in Go, it can be enhanced with plugins. Uses local SQLite database.

I am using it with Hetzner Storage Box[2], which is insane value for money at 11 euro per 5 terabytes per month.

[1]: https://github.com/mickael-kerjean/filestash [2]: https://www.hetzner.com/storage/storage-box/

Re: Show HN: Stop paying for Dropbox/Google Drive, use your own S3 bucket instead

#189

Neat! Pricing wise it might not always make sense though to use the commercial blob storages, especially for solo usage. 1 TB is roughly 20-30 USD per month at AWS/GCP only in storage, plus traffic and operations. R2 is slightly cheaper and includes traffic. Compared to e.g a Google AI plan where you get 5 TB storage for the same price (25 USD/month) + Gemini Pro thrown in.

A family member has uploaded a backup of all of the family photos to Amazon Glacial Storage, on the order of a few hundred GB, and gleefully sends me screenshots of the <$1/mo charges.

And then has to pay hundreds to get the data back

Re: Show HN: Stop paying for Dropbox/Google Drive, use your own S3 bucket instead

#190
post #8
post #3

The selling point of Dropbox/Google Drive isn't the storage itself, but that there's app for mobile and desktop operating systems which deeply integrates it in the OS so it's just like a local folder that's magically synced. So it's a cool project, but not really what I'd say is a Dropbox replacement.

On the other hand when a Dropbox user shares a file with you these days, the nudges have so gotten out of hand that it's a pain to use.

There are other less annoying alternatives such as WeTransfer.
Post reply on HN