Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: Show HN

news.ycombinator.com

171–180 of 182 posts

Re: Show HN: Show HN

#171

Hah, contrary to almost any other post, every comment including the top one is positive! That makes me glad and also it forces me to rephrase my one fear a bit. I hope this won't give people the impression that "show HN" is now a channel where you should submit anything without hesitation. I like the organic nature of it and I think it's partly because you feel like you are asking people for their attention at the pa…

We intend to enforce the Show HN guidelines (https://news.ycombinator.com/showhn.html), so if anything, you should see the scope narrow a bit.

Re: Show HN: Show HN

#172
post #64

What's the etiquette on repost? It's quite possible that you posted at the wrong moment and got buried. (unfortunately, like this comment)

The etiquette for reposting Show HNs is similar to that for reposting in general, but there is one difference.

The general rule of thumb is: when a story hasn't had significant attention on HN in about the last year, a small number of reposts is ok. That's so good stories can have more than one crack at the bat.

We can adjust that for Show HNs like this: if a Show HN has already had significant attention on HN, there shouldn't be another Show HN for the same project. In other words, no one-year cutoff. But if a Show HN hasn't had significant attention yet, a small number of reposts is ok.

As the guidelines at https://news.ycombinator.com/showhn.html point out, though, if a project has had a new and interesting breakthrough, it might be ok to make a new Show HN out of that. But not for routine feature releases.

In case anyone is wondering, yes, we're eventually going to add this information to the Hacker News FAQ. We're dragging our heels about that, partly because we want to change things slowly, and partly because we have ideas for more sophisticated dupe detection that we might want to try out first.

Re: Show HN: Show HN

#173
post #94

I guess the filter should only include titles with a colon after the "Show HN". Right now there's the story from yesterday: "Show HN vs. TechCrunch vs. Product Hunt: what's most effective to launch a product". (Is it weird that the first thing I did was to see if this story was there?)

The trouble with that suggestion is that it's fairly common for people to omit the colon. I think we'll just deal with such cases manually; that's what we did with the one you mention—we put "Ask HN: " at the beginning of the title.

Re: Show HN: Show HN

#174
post #71

Awesome, thanks for listening to feedback and implementing this feature. One question though, is there a big uptick in Show HN posts today or is something wrong with the HN RSS feed? Just noticed a full page of Show HN posts on the feed and was curious if it was organic or maybe a bug.

It was all organic, and it seems to have settled down, as expected.

Re: Show HN: Show HN

#175
post #114

I'm actually kind of bothered by this. I was about to release signups for a private beta of my current project, but apparently that no longer fits the formal criteria of "Show HN." Disappointing to say the least.

[deleted]

Re: Show HN: Show HN

#176
post #170
post #156

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You cannot show something that cannot be seen? I guess?

Well, it can be seen and it can be used, but just not by everyone yet. I have no idea where I'll go to do a beta now.

> it can be seen and it can be used

In that case you can do a Show HN. The guidelines are only trying to prevent Show HNs for things that can't be used yet. If you want specific advice, you're welcome to email hn@ycombinator.com. (That goes for anybody.)

We might need to relax this rule. Good work can get off the ground in many ways. Drew Houston got initial traction for Dropbox with a video rather than with working software. Our intention isn't to be overly strict—it's mostly to detach "Show HN" from vaporware landing pages and market tests that don't have serious work behind them.

Post reply on HN