Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: Gitdot – A better GitHub. Open-source, written in Rust

gitdot.io

171–180 of 322 posts

Re: Show HN: Gitdot – A better GitHub. Open-source, written in Rust

#172

Please, stop using "written in Rust" as some kind of advantage or killer feature.

Yeah, rust programmers are the new software vegans. They claim it is better just because of the language, ignoring the features gap, the size of the team developing and supporting the software and not having solved any issue with the software they compete against. And to be clear, this in not in favour of GH, it is against the mentality that the programming language makes better products and programmers.

> They claim it is better just because of the language

I mean, it clearly is better (in certain contexts), see e.g. https://blog.google/security/rust-in-android-move-fast-fix-t...

> We adopted Rust for its security and are seeing a 1000x reduction in memory safety vulnerability density compared to Android’s C and C++ code. But the biggest surprise was Rust's impact on software delivery. With Rust changes having a 4x lower rollback rate and spending 25% less time in code review, the safer path is now also the faster one.

Re: Show HN: Gitdot – A better GitHub. Open-source, written in Rust

#178

Please, stop using "written in Rust" as some kind of advantage or killer feature.

It would be nice if they mentioned anyhting at all they are doing to implement security features. instead of leaning onf Rust which does absolutely nothing in that regard. just look owasp top 10 and observe it has nothing to do with memory safety. and thats just a top 10 of things.

only for very few companies, memory safety issues are a thing. most of those dont use rust because it lacks tooling and certification paths -_-.

rust is like AI and cloud. heavily marketed, not bad, but not as good as whats on the box -_-. it makes life usually harder for a lot of aspects (ofc cleverly avoid in publications about it -_-)

Post reply on HN