151–160 of 241 posts
Have you tried https://github.com/steveyegge/beads
Can you give an example of how beads would be used by Claude to do something it otherwise couldn’t? I can’t quite tell what it is useful for
Not X, not Y, just slop
Just their thought management git system works pretty well for me TBH. https://www.humanlayer.dev/
Earlier quoted context omitted.
What are you both looking for? What is the problem you want solved?
Is a series of postings all in the form of questions an indication somebody hooked "eliza" up as an input device?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Have you tried using it? Not being flippant and annoying. Just curious if you tried it and what the results were
Why should he put effort into measuring a tool that the author has not? The point is there are so many of these tools an objective measure that the creators of these tools can compare against each other would be better. So a better question to ask is - Do you have any ideas for an objective way to a measure a performance of agentic coding tools? So we can truly determine what improves performance or not. I would hope…
There are a quadrillion startups (mem0, langmem, zep, supermemory), open source repos (claude-mem, beads), and tools that do this. My approach is literally just a top-level, local, git version controlled memory system with 3 commands: - /handoff - End of session, capture into an inbox.md - /sync - Route inbox.md to custom organised markdown files - /engineering (or /projects, /tasks, /research) - Load context into ne…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
No offense intended, I don't even know you at all, but I see people claim things like you did so often these days that I begin to question reality. These claims always have some big disclaimer, as yours does. I still don't know a single personal acquaintance who has claimed even a 2x improvement on general coding efficiency, not even 1.5x in general efficiency. Some of my coworkers say AI is good for this or that, bu…
I think the correct approach is to be skeptical. You should push back. I think of this stuff as trivial to understand from my point of view. I am trying to share that. I have nothing to sell, I don’t want anyone to use my exact setup. I just want to communicate the value as I see it, and be understood. The vast majority of it all is complete bullshit, so of course I am not offended that I may sound like 1000 other pe…
Even if most approaches fail, exploring that boundary feels useful - especially if the system is transparent about what it stores and why.