why upload the actual document? why not let users enter only numbers?
You can see they have a page for mortgage lenders to sign up for the other side
151–160 of 175 posts
why upload the actual document? why not let users enter only numbers?
You can see they have a page for mortgage lenders to sign up for the other side
What actions can you take by the time you are at closing ? I'm a licensed real estate agent, I actually got my license not just to learn about the business but to be able to save myself on agent commissions if I want to make an offer (if you can pass a CS data structures class you should be able to get a real estate license online in a matter of months), and I still would not try to optimize on closing costs. Do I sh…
hmm. I don't see why not optimize closing costs. I have done so on 4-5 mortgages myself. When sourcing your lending options, if you are a good borrower at least, you will have multiple options. I always asked for a full closing cost estimate and compared. Usually saved $2000-5000 through a combination of: - effectively shopping around items like title insurance, appraisals, etc by pointing out differences b/c competi…
Its going on nearly 20 years I have been watching this train wreck
A side business I have is people who contact me because they just got scammed or need help knowing if something is a scam. One of the things I tell them is to never upload financial documents containing personal information unless: - The company they’re uploading it to is well known like a major bank and the domain in the address bar matches. - They know the company they’re dealing with - which means a business addre…
I'm glad to take you up on your consulting offer.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Hey, Aaron the builder here. The scamming that happens to homebuyers is not even comparable to the risk in uploading docs to a website which promises they won't share user data with anyone. This is genuinely a pro buyer tool with no association with any 3rd party. The tool has already helped many people negotiate and get a better deal on their mortgage. Please before judging understand that 70% of buyers overpay in t…
It is fair to describe the pains of not getting analysis on mortgage loan estimates, but what I think folks are looking for is some kind of authentic answer to the problem posed. For example, you could advise the person uploading to remove PII prior to the upload, and link to pdf editing tools that allow them to do that. You could say that not including PII like full name(s) found on just about every loan estimate do…
I redacted my personal information from my loan estimate and your system couldn't process it. I don't see why you need that information to pull the closing cost numbers?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's a really new tool I quickly launched last week, there's a terms of service and privacy policy that gives info. https://closing.wtf/terms-of-service https://closing.wtf/privacy-policy I plan to go through SOC 2 / other compliancy certification in the near future. Happy to answer other questions
What, exactly, does SOC 2 have to do with anything? Can you answer the question of why this tool doesn’t work when redacting irrelevant personal information? I took my own info, redacted personal information you don’t need, and it doesn’t work.
Having recently taken a company through ISO 27001:2022 it's a pretty expensive and time consuming process, that doesn't seem reasonable to do early on in a projects creation - you don't yet know if you have product market fit.
However, you're wanting people or companies to trust you with their data - so it starts to feel a little chicken/egg
What's the best middle ground here for building trust whilst acquiring your first users?
There's a number of threads here about privacy/security concerns. I'm curious what should be the bar for grassroots/bootstrapped projects like this? Having recently taken a company through ISO 27001:2022 it's a pretty expensive and time consuming process, that doesn't seem reasonable to do early on in a projects creation - you don't yet know if you have product market fit. However, you're wanting people or companies…
There's a number of threads here about privacy/security concerns. I'm curious what should be the bar for grassroots/bootstrapped projects like this? Having recently taken a company through ISO 27001:2022 it's a pretty expensive and time consuming process, that doesn't seem reasonable to do early on in a projects creation - you don't yet know if you have product market fit. However, you're wanting people or companies…
ISO 27001 implementation and certification doesn't have to be overly expensive if you have the right team to help you. It also doesn't have to be time consuming as you can outsource a good deal of the work. I work as ISO 27001 auditor and I help companies get ISO certified. For a small company the combined cost of certification and external provider support ranges from $5k to $8k. Of course if you are a larger organi…
I'm interested in what the best strategy to build/establish trust when you can't yet afford to pay for certification is.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think it's actually refreshing to see the top comments and constructive criticism be about privacy concerns. It shows that even for little "Show HN" projects, there is growing intolerance of half-assing it. Not saying OP in particular is half-assing it, but it's good to see these questions being regularly asked front and center. I honestly wish the Tech Media paid more attention to privacy and security instead of j…
My opinion is that the OP shouldn’t even half-ass it. Ignore anybody who has complaints about privacy and 0-ass it. People just love complaining and telling other people The Right Way To Do Things.