Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: Daily price tracking for Trader Joe's

traderjoesprices.com

151–154 of 154 posts

Re: Show HN: Daily price tracking for Trader Joe's

#151

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Trader Joes just doesn’t really compete on price except for a few loss leaders like milk and eggs. Most people I know who go to TJs treat it as their default store because of the shopping experience. The stores are smaller but well staffed, have a well curated and consistent product selection, and are just more pleasant than other grocery stores.

I don't have any hard data to add, but on the face of it this just seems wrong. Their cheese is famously good-for-price / cheap-for-quality, and I think their fresh produce is very competitive as well.

If your comparison is Whole Foods or one of the big grocery stores like Ralphs or Albertsons, sure Trader Joes looks competitive.

But if you compare it to stores that actually compete on price, it's overall much more expensive even if some items or categories are well priced. I.e. Grocery Outlet or Winco or Aldi (TJ's parent company?) or any number of ethnic grocery stores like Zion or Ranch 99 are much cheaper. YMMV but here in Southern California, there are probably a dozen different chains that compete on price that blow it out of the water.

Re: Show HN: Daily price tracking for Trader Joe's

#152
post #81

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'd also change it to `Referer`, as that is what Chrome seems to be using. And referrer is set twice!

Indeed, he spelled it the right way, which is the wrong way. He should spell it wrong, which is the right way. :) I think it is funny that this misspelling hasn't been fixed after all of these years. It was typo'ed in the original http spec in 1996: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTTP_referer

There are regional variations in the use of doubled or single consontants:

UK: travelling, signalling

USA: traveling, signaling

The double l serves no purpose in these.

However, there is no such UK/USA split in "referring": both use double "r".

There is a phonetic reason for that which is that the second syllable has the emphasis in "refer", unlike "traveling" and "signaling" where the leading syllable has it.

The double "rr" indicates the stressed syllable, without which "refering" and "referer" could be misread with emphasis on the first syllable, like "buffering" or "suffering"/"sufferer".

A native speaker with good intuition for spelling would never write "refering" or "referrer", even if they find "signaling" acceptable.

Post reply on HN