Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: BBC “In Our Time”, categorised by Dewey Decimal, heavy lifting by GPT

genmon.github.io

151–160 of 177 posts

Re: Show HN: BBC “In Our Time”, categorised by Dewey Decimal, heavy lifting by GPT

#151
Some episodes that have subtitles are titled incorrectly (only using the subtitle). For example, this episode [1] is the first of a pair of episodes called The Written World, but it only shown as Episode 1.

[1]: https://genmon.github.io/braggoscope/2012/01/02/episode-1.ht...

Re: Show HN: BBC “In Our Time”, categorised by Dewey Decimal, heavy lifting by GPT

#152
Web scraping is usually pretty tedious, but I found that I could send the minimised HTML to GPT-3 and get (almost) perfect JSON back: the prompt includes the Typescript definition.

This is the part that sounds amazing to me. I haven't done web scraping since forever, but it was tag matching hell even on a consistent data source.

And that it hands you back JSON is just unfair.

Re: Show HN: BBC “In Our Time”, categorised by Dewey Decimal, heavy lifting by GPT

#153

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Here’s a powerful use - content moderation. Today we literally traumatize content moderators with the dregs of the human mind. Chatgpt is fairly good at identifying the classification of content on many dimensions, including the ones it’s actively screens for. Regardless of how you personally feel about content moderation, I would be happy to see humans not have to be actively involved in it and face the traumas they…

Automating your moderation policies is a cop-out. It isolates you even further from the peons whose lives you're controlling. European humans have the right for any automated decision affecting them to be reviewed by a human. We do not want a world where a tiny handful of people, getting fewer by the day if it's Twitter, have untrammeled control over what billions of people can say, see or do. We can't let businesses…

1) you can have human reviewed appeal and have automated moderation 2) a provider of a service is not a provider of a public commons, nor is the service being confined to a specific type of discourse preventing anyone from doing anything in their life. You don’t have the right to go to a movie theatre and use it to practice your singing recital during the movie - the theatre owner can and will kick you out. This doesn’t trample on your rights - you can still practicing singing, just not there. Likewise you can still spew racism and talk about child sexual abuse in your home all you want. But no one is obliged to provide you a platform for that. 3) I see nothing superior to a capricious and biased human judging my content vs a capricious and biased model judging my content. The human, however, will be traumatized by the “millions of people” made miserable by their inability to spew hate and share child porn on Facebook. 4) we still do depend on judges and laws. Today the judges as laws say you not only have the right but the obligation to create a space relatively safe. In your European utopia speech and thought is even more limited by law than in the US, but in both locales forum providers are held to a standard. Right now in the US there’s a major case in front of the Supreme Court which will determine whether these companies can be held liable directly for failing to sufficiently moderate - if it passes, they’ll be even more obliged to “purify” their platforms of anything that anyone might feel compelled to sue them over. But even now all providers have to conform to the laws and judgements of the lands they operate in, and those lands say it’s not only ok to moderate, but it’s mandatory. So, your final point really, truly, makes no sense.

Re: Show HN: BBC “In Our Time”, categorised by Dewey Decimal, heavy lifting by GPT

#154

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Fusion 360 has a generative AI design extension already. Never used it, I’m too much a poor to use something like that.

There is a free hobby plan for Fusion 360 that I use for my personal projects.

I thought it doesn’t have the generative AI extension? When I looked at the plan comparison it was a part of the commercial.

Re: Show HN: BBC “In Our Time”, categorised by Dewey Decimal, heavy lifting by GPT

#156

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm about to start work in this space. Some companies are getting close to full building automation, Augmenta seems to me to be closest / have the best approach. [0] Although the complexity of building standards is a challenge, the speed and quality of various generative algorithms are still major limitations. [0] https://www.augmenta.ai/

Thanks for linking augmenta. I was wondering if you know of other similar companies? I'm an experienced structural engineer who's just completed an MSc in Comp.Sci. I want to combine the two disciplines and so far I've only been looking for consultants who utilise parametric design (Rhino + Grasshopper).

No problem!

I don’t know of any other multidiscipline generative design companies, but for process plant design there is OptiPlant and PipeStream. There are a lot in the architecture space but these are mostly for high level conceptual design.

In my experience many structural engineers code and use simple parametric models. Finding a company using actual generative design algorithms is still rare but there are definitely engineering teams out there who value comp.sci skills.

Re: Show HN: BBC “In Our Time”, categorised by Dewey Decimal, heavy lifting by GPT

#157

In Our Time is one of the best podcasts out there. Are there any similar ones?

Similar to In Our Time is another BBC radio programme called The Forum (from BBC World Service) which explores world history, culture and ideas. Every week an eclectic topic is discussed with three experts in a lively, informative and stimulating discussion. Highly recommended:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p004kln9/episodes/downloads

Re: Show HN: BBC “In Our Time”, categorised by Dewey Decimal, heavy lifting by GPT

#160
post #115

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I remember having that epiphany in 2017, reading the original google transformer press release. I remember thinking “they taught computers to understand!, and someday soon i’ll be able to translate anything into anything.” And not like translating “languages” but translating contexts and concepts. LLMs really shine when you try and combine two previously untouched things or map one bit of knowledge it a common patter…

LLMs will be used to discover "not so obvious" connections in science. I think we will see first scientific discoveries done by LLMs very soon (in fact, such works are probably already happening). Expect major breakthroughs in physics, math, cosmology, biology, etc. published in Nature and authored by LLMs.

Cranking that hype level to the next stage eh?
Post reply on HN