Show HN: New AI edits images based on text instructions

Post by adammarples » Sun, Jan 22, 2023, 4:31 PM UTC

sandworm101 wrote: post #120

sschueller wrote: post #118

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Then instead of just presenting me with a blank image tell me why it's blank. Or add the word "nude" to the default negative filter which by default doesn't have that in it. The default is: negative-prompt:"Ugly, duplication, duplicates, mutilation, deformed, mutilated, mutation, twisted body, disfigured, bad anatomy, out of frame, extra fingers, mutated hands, poorly drawn hands, extra limbs, malformed limbs, missin…

Sure, if this was a commercial product i would also scream about feedback. But as this is a free side project im not going to criticize decisions on what they think they need to do to avoid unnecesary drama. I credit them for making the bypass relatively simple.

Post by dspillett » Sun, Jan 22, 2023, 4:33 PM UTC

88stacks wrote: post #117

TekMol wrote: post #109

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Dark patterns are frowned upon here on HN. Letting the user upload dozens of images and only after that telling them they need an account. Not good.

its not a dark pattern, what would happen to the images after uploading?

Post by babarock » Sun, Jan 22, 2023, 4:55 PM UTC

sandworm101 wrote: post #115

sschueller wrote: post #110

I am not a fan of software such as this putting in an arbitrarily "safety" feature which can only be disabled via undocumented environment variable. At least make it a flag documented for people who don't have an issue with nudity. There isn't even an indication that there is a "safety" issue, you just get a blank image and are wondering if your GPU/model or install is corrupted. This isn't running on a website that…

Nudity isnt really the core issue. It is about illegal content. Nudity is the over-protective, over-inclusive bandaid solution to prevent this thing from being used to generate the very illegal material that will trigger authorities.

Post by sandworm101 » Sun, Jan 22, 2023, 5:17 PM UTC

babarock wrote: post #156

sandworm101 wrote: post #115

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Nudity isnt really the core issue. It is about illegal content. Nudity is the over-protective, over-inclusive bandaid solution to prevent this thing from being used to generate the very illegal material that will trigger authorities.

Genuinely curious what type of content would be considered illegal here. - the tool is drawing original content. - the tool is executing on my laptop. - the output image is not shared with anyone. In a way, whatever this tool can do, MS Paint could (theoretically) do. Or am I misunderstanding the whole thing?

Post by mensetmanusman » Sun, Jan 22, 2023, 5:35 PM UTC

xwdv wrote: post #146

social_quotient wrote: post #128

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The hands issue is going to be an awesome story for all of us in 10-20 years. The younger generation just won’t fathom how hard it was to get proper hands. I wonder what a parallel comparable now would be? Something the slightly technical general public just can’t wrap their head around why it was complicated “back then”. Maybe todays example is a smart voice assistant like Alexa.

Or maybe it will never be fixed, and in the future when they are trying to determine if someone is a human or an artificial replica, they will simply ask them to draw a set of human hands as a test.