This is like Firebase but actually fun! Jokes aside though, I think there's a real use-case for something like this: Small multi-user CRUD apps, most often for a confined audience that don't warrant whipping up some kind of web server software and deploying it to a VM or a lambda function or whatever. Just create some tables, write some markup and you're done. Share the URL, it's live! You could also use it for stuff…
Show HN: Ugliest.app – Ugly but good app platform
151–160 of 169 posts
Re: Show HN: Ugliest.app – Ugly but good app platform
#152Re: Show HN: Ugliest.app – Ugly but good app platform
#153Re: Show HN: Ugliest.app – Ugly but good app platform
#154Re: Show HN: Ugliest.app – Ugly but good app platform
#155Heads up for the creator: putting everything under ugliest.app allows pages to read the same cookies across different "apps". If anyone plans to use the platform for production (which you appear to welcome), nothing substantial can be done. I forgot what made github.com switch to github.io. Something similar but totally separate.
> I forgot what made github.com switch to github.io. Something similar but totally separate. Same reason: to prevent user-generated/user-hosted content from being able to read GitHub.com cookies.
The fully writeup is here: https://github.blog/2013-04-09-yummy-cookies-across-domains/
Re: Show HN: Ugliest.app – Ugly but good app platform
#156This is like Firebase but actually fun! Jokes aside though, I think there's a real use-case for something like this: Small multi-user CRUD apps, most often for a confined audience that don't warrant whipping up some kind of web server software and deploying it to a VM or a lambda function or whatever. Just create some tables, write some markup and you're done. Share the URL, it's live! You could also use it for stuff…
I do a little tech consulting on the side (mostly web dev, but sometimes just regular "IT stuff" too)...and I've had clients who i know would be a pain if i conduct the usual process for developing an app/website for them...and often (to save myself from headaches) try to look for a solution for them that is something like Access (or super Excel) but for the web...and haven't found one that is nicely balanced yet. This kind of thing - if it evolves a little more on the ugliness side - might eventually fit the bill. (To clarify: i have no care about the ugly aspect, but the same annoying clients who would benefit from this paradigm are the same ones who criticize apps because they're not "pretty enough"...So, there's that to consider.)
Re: Show HN: Ugliest.app – Ugly but good app platform
#157This is like Firebase but actually fun! Jokes aside though, I think there's a real use-case for something like this: Small multi-user CRUD apps, most often for a confined audience that don't warrant whipping up some kind of web server software and deploying it to a VM or a lambda function or whatever. Just create some tables, write some markup and you're done. Share the URL, it's live! You could also use it for stuff…
> something like Access, kind of, but on the web I do a little tech consulting on the side (mostly web dev, but sometimes just regular "IT stuff" too)...and I've had clients who i know would be a pain if i conduct the usual process for developing an app/website for them...and often (to save myself from headaches) try to look for a solution for them that is something like Access (or super Excel) but for the web...and…
Re: Show HN: Ugliest.app – Ugly but good app platform
#158Heads up for the creator: putting everything under ugliest.app allows pages to read the same cookies across different "apps". If anyone plans to use the platform for production (which you appear to welcome), nothing substantial can be done. I forgot what made github.com switch to github.io. Something similar but totally separate.
EDIT: The linked Github article states exactly that, is it out of date?
Re: Show HN: Ugliest.app – Ugly but good app platform
#159I love this, but it doesn't look like server-side language is Turing complete. It can only read, write, and delete rows; branches on admin; and returns a random number. Is it possible to extend the language in a way defining functions, if stmt and for loops are possible? Since it already has if, I wonder if I can branch on things other than "admin". EDIT: I stand corrected, looks like using `range .. end` you can act…
It supports eq (==), ne (!=), gt (>), ge (>=), lt (<), le (<=).