Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: Use Their ID – Use your local UK MP’s ID for the Online Safety Act

use-their-id.com

141–150 of 297 posts

Re: Show HN: Use Their ID – Use your local UK MP’s ID for the Online Safety Act

#141
post #43

Chinese Netizens are very familiar with Xi Jinping's national ID number precisely for this reason :-) ID verification is enforced on all Chinese websites. People figured out they can just use Xi's ID number.

lol on a much lighter note, for many years I used to use 111-111-1111 as a general phone number for CVS card discounts. It stopped working several years ago though.

This reminds me: I've noticed that Starbucks now requires a few pieces of information to use their WiFi network. One is email and they are doing some sort of validation which will reject emails like whoopsileanedonxxxxxxxx@aol.com but will accept other, legit AOL emails. How are they deciding what is/not a valid email? Are they using a compiled list of emails that have been seen in the wild? What if it's a brand new address, though? Presumably AOL isn't exposing a service for them to use in realtime. I haven't tested this extensively or with other providers.

It's obvious that they care (to some extent) that they're getting valid emails, so why not use a basic regex on the FE and an OTP which gets sent to the provided address?

Re: Show HN: Use Their ID – Use your local UK MP’s ID for the Online Safety Act

#142

Earlier quoted context omitted.

lol on a much lighter note, for many years I used to use 111-111-1111 as a general phone number for CVS card discounts. It stopped working several years ago though.

As a Canadian I was lost and confused when visiting the States (in the before time) and a gas pump asked for my zip code. So I put in the one and only zip code I know. I bet you can guess.

Did it work?

Re: Show HN: Use Their ID – Use your local UK MP’s ID for the Online Safety Act

#143
post #54

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What a fucking mess. Labour voted in conservative policy. Conservatives voted against it. Reform, whilst all over the news for being against it, voted for it.

I think it's fun when the elected government doesn't do what the people who elected them want. Like a middle finger to democracy.

"Alexa, summarise the last 15+ years of UK politics in two sentences."

Re: Show HN: Use Their ID – Use your local UK MP’s ID for the Online Safety Act

#145

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm not sure that argument would hold up legally. You could use an image editing site to create IDs and counterfeit currency as well, but such sites are legal.

Photoshop does not allow you to edit currency images. https://go.photoshelter.com/brands/blog/photographers/blog/t...

This is only for images of money with a specific digital watermark; it doesn't detect the EURion constellation, so you can take your own and work with it just fine.

Re: Show HN: Use Their ID – Use your local UK MP’s ID for the Online Safety Act

#146
post #139
post #69

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Clamping down on freedoms is not conservative policy. Crap like Communications Act 2003 and Ofcom has been Labour policy for decades.

Here's the Conservative policy for the Online Safety Act 2023, during the Sunak government: * https://legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2023/50/notes/division/3/in... Here's the Conservative white paper on Online Harms from 2019, during the May government: * https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/online-harms-whi...

To be fair, u/jojobas wrote "conservative" (little-c), not "Conservative".

Re: Show HN: Use Their ID – Use your local UK MP’s ID for the Online Safety Act

#147
post #54

Do please take a moment to consider which MPs carry the burden here. It's mainly a single flavour. Mention it on the doorstep next time. https://votes.parliament.uk/votes/commons/division/1926

What a fucking mess. Labour voted in conservative policy. Conservatives voted against it. Reform, whilst all over the news for being against it, voted for it.

[dead]

Re: Show HN: Use Their ID – Use your local UK MP’s ID for the Online Safety Act

#148

Earlier quoted context omitted.

lol on a much lighter note, for many years I used to use 111-111-1111 as a general phone number for CVS card discounts. It stopped working several years ago though.

This reminds me: I've noticed that Starbucks now requires a few pieces of information to use their WiFi network. One is email and they are doing some sort of validation which will reject emails like whoopsileanedonxxxxxxxx@aol.com but will accept other, legit AOL emails. How are they deciding what is/not a valid email? Are they using a compiled list of emails that have been seen in the wild? What if it's a brand new…

> why not use a basic regex on the FE and an OTP which gets sent to the provided address?

I can't prove I control an email in order to use your wifi, if I can't use your wifi.

Re: Show HN: Use Their ID – Use your local UK MP’s ID for the Online Safety Act

#149

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm not sure what this recent vote is about. The original Online Safety Act was introduced and passed by the Tories in 2023 (although it's only coming into effect now, obviously.) So the Tories, who created this awful bill in the first place, are now voting against it? Clown country.

That happens all over the place, conservatives pass a time bomb bill, they lose control of congress/house, time bomb is about to become effective, they now fight to overturn it and place the blame on the current ruling folks.

This isn’t one of those cases. It was a well intentioned Bill that passed with Labour’s support but was very badly planned and written. Hell, it wouldn’t even have helped counter the misinformation being spread last summer and this summer to try and instigate more race riots!

Re: Show HN: Use Their ID – Use your local UK MP’s ID for the Online Safety Act

#150

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think it's fun when the elected government doesn't do what the people who elected them want. Like a middle finger to democracy.

"Alexa, summarise the last 15+ years of UK politics in two sentences."

I mean, the last 15 years were mostly Tories and the public kept voting them in. I’m glad I’m not a politician because I have no sympathy for Brexit voters who voted Tory in 2019, claim “I know what a voted for,” and now complain about how much poorer and full of immigrants the country now is. It was all there in the 2019 Conservative manifesto they voted for!
Post reply on HN