Show HN: UrlRoulette – Pass a URL to the next visitor • Hacker News Board

Re: Show HN: UrlRoulette – Pass a URL to the next visitor

#141

Post by badminton1 » Mon, Apr 17, 2017, 8:41 AM UTC

laumars wrote: post #140

badminton1 wrote: post #137

Earlier quoted context omitted.

laumars, you seem to be antagonizing my comments and downvoting regularly. There are people with different perspectives here in HN, but I do not see you replying to each one of them. Your only recent activity has been exclusively on my threads, with a tone not allowed on the HN comments section (personal attacks), baiting for responses so you can downvote them, since you can only downvote a reply once and there's a m…

You cannot down vote replies so it's not me who's been negative reping you. I also haven't been following you around HN nor posting personal attacks. I just said "all URLs are parameters" because your comment was weird and misleading (for reasons i elaborated in the other post i left yesterday). HN is a technical discussion forum so there will be times when people will disagree with the technical points you raise; pa…

Previous to this, your 20 last comments were on another thread of mine. I could argue with you, but it is just a bait to downvote replies.

So you were randomly browsing HN news, and you found my comment, a non-top comment among hundreds or possibly thousands of comments, on a random post.

Then, you were not looking at the author, but rather at the comment, and you decided to reply to this one in particular. I am sure what I said strictly speaking, was incorrect, but not sure if this is the least correct of the comments in this topic.

Let me tell you that is unlikely enough to be considered intentional.

Then, stop mixing technical responses with insults. This is an insult:

> particularly when you continue to comment on technical topics you only partially understand (as seen here).

Just stop making excuses. This is the last response I give you on HN. I have implemented HTTP from the ground up I have nothing to prove to you.

Re: Show HN: UrlRoulette – Pass a URL to the next visitor

#142

Post by hayleox » Mon, Apr 17, 2017, 4:52 PM UTC

Retr0spectrum wrote: post #61

It probably goes without saying, but you should definitely use some kind of sandboxed browser/session if you want to try this. One annoying URL someone could submit is superlogout.com, which uses logout CSRF to log you out of a whole ton of websites at once. However, I couldn't get it to work in a private tab, because apparently the invisible captcha fails.

Lol, thanks for the suggestion, just submitted superlogout.com; got a Kotaku article in return

Re: Show HN: UrlRoulette – Pass a URL to the next visitor

#143

Post by laumars » Mon, Apr 17, 2017, 9:38 PM UTC

badminton1 wrote: post #141

laumars wrote: post #140

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You cannot down vote replies so it's not me who's been negative reping you. I also haven't been following you around HN nor posting personal attacks. I just said "all URLs are parameters" because your comment was weird and misleading (for reasons i elaborated in the other post i left yesterday). HN is a technical discussion forum so there will be times when people will disagree with the technical points you raise; pa…

Previous to this, your 20 last comments were on another thread of mine. I could argue with you, but it is just a bait to downvote replies. So you were randomly browsing HN news, and you found my comment, a non-top comment among hundreds or possibly thousands of comments, on a random post. Then, you were not looking at the author, but rather at the comment, and you decided to reply to this one in particular. I am sure…

The last 20 posts might have been on a thread of yours (I haven't checked) but only about half of that was actually replying to you - possibly less. And some of those posts were even defending you. A decision I since regretted when you turned psycho on me and demanded I refund you karma(!!!) despite being literally the only person in that thread that defended you. This was also why I gave up on that thread and stopped replying to you).

As I said before, I didn't check this post was by the same user as the other thread. I don't tend to pay much attention to user handles. Sure it probably seems a massive coincidence but coincidence is hardly proof of malicious intent.

> I have implemented HTTP from the ground up I have nothing to prove to you.

Then why even make such a weird statement as that? You can literally "implement HTTP from the ground up" with a shell one-liner. It still doesn't prove you understand the nuances of the HTTP protocol; let alone any have any grasp of web security (which was the real point you were discussing here when you blundered your way through HTTP protocol jargon).

> I could argue with you, but it is just a bait to downvote replies.

How would that even work when HN disables the option to down vote replies?

Honestly, I'm not out to persecute you. You just need to chill out a little on here if you want _other people_ to stop down voting you.