[deleted]
Show HN: FablePool – pool money behind a prompt, and Fable builds it in public
131–140 of 301 posts
Re: Show HN: FablePool – pool money behind a prompt, and Fable builds it in public
#132Earlier quoted context omitted.
if fable is writing it, courts my declare that its not even public domain? not a copywrightable work
I don’t know, if the design itself is copyrighted you could argue that the AI is just a bunch of hired workers that built it for extremely low wages. If I hired a bunch of people to build me a house, and I drafted the architectural plans with the help of a paid architect, neither the architect nor the builders have ownership over the home. So if a collection of people design something together maybe that has merit, t…
I’m pretty sure copyright office has settled that already. Inly human expression can be copyrighted:
> As described above, in many circumstances these outputs will be copyrightable in whole or in part—where AI is used as a tool, and where a human has been able to determine the expressive elements they contain. Prompts alone, however, at this stage are unlikely to satisfy those requirements.
https://www.copyright.gov/ai/Copyright-and-Artificial-Intell...
Re: Show HN: FablePool – pool money behind a prompt, and Fable builds it in public
#133This idea reads like a joke, but there's something to it. One feature request: In addition to high-level milestones, it would be cool if a partially-funded project would generate a public, highly detailed implementation plan. Also, IANAL but MIT is still a license with a copyright holder. I don't think saying "it's MIT, we all own it" is defensible. The courts might view all this code as public domain.
The problem with running open source code is the security aspect, but with Mythos running point, how would you distribute revenue is the real question. Which market is even left after since the sasspocaloypse?
Maybe the financiers of a project just need it, they need it working, not to generate revenue for them?
Re: Show HN: FablePool – pool money behind a prompt, and Fable builds it in public
#134Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Build a completely greenroom, open source AWS > est. total target $516.00 Lol
Is green room a word? I've heard clean room. And green field. Is it just an amalgamation?
It is. But doesn’t fit with the rest of the sentence.
“In a television studio, theatre or concert hall, the room where performers await their entrance.” https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/green_room
Re: Show HN: FablePool – pool money behind a prompt, and Fable builds it in public
#135I feel like using Fable in the name is a mistake, who knows how long that model will be around.
I don't think using the name Fable is wrong, but I think a pool of Fables should be called a Grimm, or possibly an Aesop.
Perhaps Grimoire?
"A grimoire is a textbook of magic and sorcery. Traditionally, it contains instructions for casting spells, performing divination, creating magical objects like talismans, and summoning supernatural entities such as angels or spirits."
Seems to fit.
Re: Show HN: FablePool – pool money behind a prompt, and Fable builds it in public
#136"I want an open source AWS" with $500 budget made me guffaw
"I have a turbofan model, pls build an Airbus" sounds about right
I got downvoted probably for tone which is my bad but what I’m laughing at is this person doesnt seem to understand why people pay for aws, it’s certainly not the laughably bad console or the buggy control plane. it’s the reliability guarantees granted by their massive physical infrastructure that was meant to replace sysadmin’s running racks in a closet and wrangling terrible ansible/chef playbooks.
this literally already exists if you’re willing to maintain your own physical infra, and has for a long time - nothing aws does is that innovative software wise. maybe their managed k8s eliminates a ton of pain, but I dont know. it’s the reliability guarantee + support + not having to maintain physical servers. if youre willing to shirk all that and do it yourself why would you want aws? lol
tldr; was laughing at the xy vibe of the ask
Re: Show HN: FablePool – pool money behind a prompt, and Fable builds it in public
#137Earlier quoted context omitted.
A lot of AWS is built on open-source. This is obviously ignoring hardware costs. I don’t know if it is all that ridiculous anymore. These models are very good at wiring together open-source systems. The world is crazy right now…
You, my friend, have drunk from the goblet of koolaid.
lol but at least in comes in a nice cup then
Re: Show HN: FablePool – pool money behind a prompt, and Fable builds it in public
#138Excellent idea, I see a few issues though.
First, your server is struggling. It took about 20+ seconds to respond just now, FYI.
Second, it's not obvious to me that I can get my money back if something doesn't pan out / get approved by a certain date from the homepage alone. That might make people hesitant to put anything in if they think it might get locked in there forever if the site dies / you take it down / etc.
Re: Show HN: FablePool – pool money behind a prompt, and Fable builds it in public
#139"Solve Garbage Collection in C# for HFT · $10.00 raised of est. $200.00 target" This can't be serious. Broader point I am making is, what differentiates genuine ideas from the token burn? What happens when the pool exhausts but the task is not done?
The sarcastic solution is to use C# bindings to a non-GC language. Put all available memory under control of a pool allocator and enjoy the perf gain.
Similar solution worked for ASP back in 1999. ASP/VBS was terrible slow at string building and Response.Write. Build it in the fast code and then output.
Re: Show HN: FablePool – pool money behind a prompt, and Fable builds it in public
#140This idea reads like a joke, but there's something to it. One feature request: In addition to high-level milestones, it would be cool if a partially-funded project would generate a public, highly detailed implementation plan. Also, IANAL but MIT is still a license with a copyright holder. I don't think saying "it's MIT, we all own it" is defensible. The courts might view all this code as public domain.
I think pooling/donating tokens will be a thing. Not sure if like this, but in some format. The Django project, for example, came out and said they don't want your tokens, but I think a lot of people/projects will (do?) want your tokens.
The good ones all seem to be pointing in the direction of Django. Which, on its own, says a lot about how likely people will care about vibe-coded anything, whether pooled or not.