Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: Stop paying for Dropbox/Google Drive, use your own S3 bucket instead

locker.dev

131–140 of 219 posts

Re: Show HN: Stop paying for Dropbox/Google Drive, use your own S3 bucket instead

#132
post #125
post #107

Why wouldn't I trust a vibe coded app that has existed for 1 week with all my important data?

Because you can self-host it all and validate the source yourself!

How can I practically verify 2TB of a life's worth of files while guaranteeing I won't have data loss due to some edge cases and race conditions that delete my data.

Every time I've created my own backup script I realized knowing what to delete and when is not easy. IMO the practical solution to this is to just pay for more storage (within reason).

Re: Show HN: Stop paying for Dropbox/Google Drive, use your own S3 bucket instead

#138
post #132
post #125

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Because you can self-host it all and validate the source yourself!

How can I practically verify 2TB of a life's worth of files while guaranteeing I won't have data loss due to some edge cases and race conditions that delete my data. Every time I've created my own backup script I realized knowing what to delete and when is not easy. IMO the practical solution to this is to just pay for more storage (within reason).

How can you guarantee you'll have access to your 2TB Google Drive when they ban your Google account for breaching terms or accidentally tripping a circuit breaker across one of their offerings?

Yup, pay more but get 2 providers.

Re: Show HN: Stop paying for Dropbox/Google Drive, use your own S3 bucket instead

#140

Wouldn’t this be way more expensive? Example 2TB: Google $10/mo vs S3 ~&45/mo? You could get cheaper that Google Drive with glacier tiers but that’s a different level of restrictions and still has retrieval fees.

If you use S3 Standard - Infrequent Access then it is $25/mo.
Post reply on HN