Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: Now I Get It – Translate scientific papers into interactive webpages

nowigetit.us

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

131–140 of 141 posts

Re: Show HN: Now I Get It – Translate scientific papers into interactive webpages

#131

Post by whattheheckheck »

jbdamask wrote: post #92

Thanks to everyone who tried this today and those who provided feedback. I really appreciate your time. Here are some stats: 100 papers processed. Cost breakdown: LLM cost $64 AWS cost $0.0003 Claude's editorial comment about this breakdown, "For context, the Anthropic API cost ($63.32) is roughly 200,000x the AWS infrastructure cost. The AWS bill is a rounding error compared to the LLM spend." Category breakdown: Co…

Make it breakdown to automatic tiktok/youtube short videos

Re: Show HN: Now I Get It – Translate scientific papers into interactive webpages

#132

Post by jbdamask »

whattheheckheck wrote: post #131
jbdamask wrote: post #92

Thanks to everyone who tried this today and those who provided feedback. I really appreciate your time. Here are some stats: 100 papers processed. Cost breakdown: LLM cost $64 AWS cost $0.0003 Claude's editorial comment about this breakdown, "For context, the Anthropic API cost ($63.32) is roughly 200,000x the AWS infrastructure cost. The AWS bill is a rounding error compared to the LLM spend." Category breakdown: Co…

Make it breakdown to automatic tiktok/youtube short videos

That's a really cool idea. Can you elaborate?

Re: Show HN: Now I Get It – Translate scientific papers into interactive webpages

#133

Post by jbdamask »

yashpxl wrote: post #130

there is a term i'm exploring "vibe research" if you can make it possible? i mean i've been doing it a lot with claude, scrapping scientific papers and all getting deep into rabbit hole for finding new ideas and insights. im not a researcher btw im just a curious guy on the internet and this is my fav thing to do.

Some commenters have suggested turning this into a sort of graph where references are either brought into the page or new pages are made for references then linked. Is that what you're thinking about?

Re: Show HN: Now I Get It – Translate scientific papers into interactive webpages

#134

Post by whattheheckheck »

jbdamask wrote: post #132
whattheheckheck wrote: post #131

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Make it breakdown to automatic tiktok/youtube short videos

That's a really cool idea. Can you elaborate?

Yeah info arbitrage, dense info -> byte size -> let the algorithm figure out who wants it

Re: Show HN: Now I Get It – Translate scientific papers into interactive webpages

#135

Post by RagnarD »

jbdamask wrote: post #113
RagnarD wrote: post #108

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And those are all auto-generated?

If by "auto-generated" you mean, does the LLM generate the output from the input, then yes.

Yes, exactly what I mean. Thanks.

Re: Show HN: Now I Get It – Translate scientific papers into interactive webpages

#136

Post by RagnarD »

zitrusfrucht wrote: post #116
RagnarD wrote: post #108

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And those are all auto-generated?

Of course they are not. That is the whole point.

The author confirms that they ARE, so what's your "of course they are not" about? You might have misunderstood my obvious meaning: is the output webpage fully generated without human tweaking just from the paper alone?

Re: Show HN: Now I Get It – Translate scientific papers into interactive webpages

#137

Post by jazzpush2 »

RagnarD wrote: post #136
zitrusfrucht wrote: post #116

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Of course they are not. That is the whole point.

The author confirms that they ARE, so what's your "of course they are not" about? You might have misunderstood my obvious meaning: is the output webpage fully generated without human tweaking just from the paper alone?

All of the links I posted were published before ChatGPT, no AI.

Re: Show HN: Now I Get It – Translate scientific papers into interactive webpages

#138

Post by zitrusfrucht »

RagnarD wrote: post #136
zitrusfrucht wrote: post #116

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Of course they are not. That is the whole point.

The author confirms that they ARE, so what's your "of course they are not" about? You might have misunderstood my obvious meaning: is the output webpage fully generated without human tweaking just from the paper alone?

You asked that on a post with examples of data journalism articles which are obviously not AI generated. So when you say ask about „those“ it was clear to me that you meant these examples.

Re: Show HN: Now I Get It – Translate scientific papers into interactive webpages

#139

Post by jbdamask »

I should probably just make a new post but if anyone is still watching, I've made a couple of changes and have more coming:

1) Modes. You can now choose between Native, Non-Technical, or Kid-Friendly mode. Here are results for the same paper Native: https://test.nowigetit.us/pages/62ef3639-02f0-472b-b0a6-79f6... Non-technical: https://test.nowigetit.us/pages/eba32173-269f-4b5c-9df1-c782... Kid-friendly: https://nowigetit.us/pages/3c413c94-d843-4e84-8805-22af16021...

2) I'm working on user accounts with private galleries

3) Getting closer to opening this up with a cost-plus pricing model. Hopefully by next week but we'll see.

Post reply on HN