Earlier quoted context omitted.
Does anybody find it funny that sci-fi movies have to heavily distort "robot voices" to make them sound "convincingly robotic"? A robotic, explicitly non-natural voice would be perfectly acceptable, and even desirable, in many situations. I don't expect a smart toaster to talk like a BBC host; it'd be enough is the speech if easy to recognize.
A robotic, explicitly non-natural voice would be perfectly acceptable, and even desirable, in many situations[...]it'd be enough is the speech if easy to recognize. We've had formant synths for several decades, and they're perfectly understandable and require a tiny amount of computing power, but people tend not to want to listen to them: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_Automatic_Mouth https://simulationcorner…
Show HN: Kitten TTS – 25MB CPU-Only, Open-Source TTS Model
131–140 of 383 posts
Re: Show HN: Kitten TTS – 25MB CPU-Only, Open-Source TTS Model
#132I tried it. Not bad for the size (of the model) and speed. Once you install all the massive number of libraries and things needed we are a far cry away from 25MB though. Cool project nonetheless.
Re: Show HN: Kitten TTS – 25MB CPU-Only, Open-Source TTS Model
#133Is this english only?
Re: Show HN: Kitten TTS – 25MB CPU-Only, Open-Source TTS Model
#134System Requirements Works literally everywhere Haha, on one of my machines my python version is too old, and the package/dependencies don't want to install. On another machie the python version is too new, and the package/dependencies don't want to install.
We are working to fix that. Thanks
Re: Show HN: Kitten TTS – 25MB CPU-Only, Open-Source TTS Model
#135I hope this is the future. Offline, small ML models, running inference on ubiquitous, inexpensive hardware. Models that are easy to integrate into other things, into devices and apps, and even to drive from other models maybe.
Such hardware is not general-purpose, and upgrading the model would not be possible, but there's plenty of use-cases where this is reasonable.
Re: Show HN: Kitten TTS – 25MB CPU-Only, Open-Source TTS Model
#136Earlier quoted context omitted.
This doesn’t seem to work on Safari. Works great on Chrome, though
Hmm, we will look into it.
Re: Show HN: Kitten TTS – 25MB CPU-Only, Open-Source TTS Model
#137Reddit post with generated audio sample: https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1mhyzp7/kitten_...
Sounds slow and like something from an anine
The comparison to make is expressiveness and correct intonation for long sentences vs something like espeak. It actually sounds amazing for the size. The closest thing is probably KokoroTTS at 82M params and ~300MB.
Re: Show HN: Kitten TTS – 25MB CPU-Only, Open-Source TTS Model
#138say is only 193K on MacOS ls -lah /usr/bin/say -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 193K 15 Nov 2024 /usr/bin/say Usage: M1-Mac-mini ~ % say "hello world this is the kitten TTS model speaking"
Tried that on 26 beta, and the default voice sounds a lot smoother than it used it. Running `man say` reveals that "this tool uses the Speech Synthesis manager", so I'm guessing the Apple Intelligence stuff is kicking in.
Re: Show HN: Kitten TTS – 25MB CPU-Only, Open-Source TTS Model
#139Reddit post with generated audio sample: https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1mhyzp7/kitten_...
Re: Show HN: Kitten TTS – 25MB CPU-Only, Open-Source TTS Model
#140Web version: https://clowerweb.github.io/kitten-tts-web-demo/ It sounds ok, but impressive for the size.
On PC it's a python dependency hell but someone managed to package it in self contained JS code that works offline once it loaded the model? How is that done?
Plus, Python software are dependency hell in general, while webpages have to be self-contained by their nature (thank god we no longer have Silverlight and Java applets...)