131–140 of 207 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Could be a swede who meant "GDP" (BNP = BruttoNationalProdukten = Gross Domestic Product)
More plausible than "British National Party". Does it raise GDP, though? I would have thought a more accurate thing to say is it raises the global temperature.
Maybe they were using Grok :-)
I bookmarked this comment a few months ago because I thought it was hilarious and increasingly accurate: It's approaching a very strange situation where people make overly wordy and bloated AI generated content and other people try to use AI to compress it back into useful pellets vaguely corresponding to the actual prompts used to generate the initial content. Which were the only bits anybody cared about in the firs…
Isn't this an advancement in communication though? People can put out a message in whatever language or style they prefer, the machine translators translate it into an overly verbose AI vomit, and readers condense it back down into the exact kind of personalized language they're wanting to consume.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Why are we going through this encoding-decoding process? I think succinctness and low-noise writing will be treasured in the age of AI. I hope so, because I hope this will lead to making it OK to skip the manual encoding process. After all, AI isn't doing anything new here - it's automating the customary need for communication to be in wordy prose paying right respects to right people. Maybe people will finally see…
perhaps, but humans are human, and building relationships require a culturally appropriate carrier wave - especially in global work
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Could be a swede who meant "GDP" (BNP = BruttoNationalProdukten = Gross Domestic Product)
More plausible than "British National Party". Does it raise GDP, though? I would have thought a more accurate thing to say is it raises the global temperature.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
More plausible than "British National Party". Does it raise GDP, though? I would have thought a more accurate thing to say is it raises the global temperature.
Two units of work have been carried out, so yes it raises GDP.
Oh, wait. I'm starting to understand that you fed it through a bullshit generator rather than just stripping it of the various pieces of unrelated content and providing just the original text, which might've been interesting to me.
I bookmarked this comment a few months ago because I thought it was hilarious and increasingly accurate: It's approaching a very strange situation where people make overly wordy and bloated AI generated content and other people try to use AI to compress it back into useful pellets vaguely corresponding to the actual prompts used to generate the initial content. Which were the only bits anybody cared about in the firs…
What that comment is describing is already here. A colleague sent an email that was obviously AI-generated (bloated, repetitive, low signal-to-noise ratio). I guess he's quite new to the team and it's a sign of formality, but I really don't mind if you send me just the bullet-point notes... Why are we going through this encoding-decoding process? I think succinctness and low-noise writing will be treasured in the age…
I bookmarked this comment a few months ago because I thought it was hilarious and increasingly accurate: It's approaching a very strange situation where people make overly wordy and bloated AI generated content and other people try to use AI to compress it back into useful pellets vaguely corresponding to the actual prompts used to generate the initial content. Which were the only bits anybody cared about in the firs…
So at least for legal documents this LLM craze is a big improvement! It is much harder to out-spend other people on LAWYER stuff now.