lol. really stretching the word "better"
Show HN: Gitdot – A better GitHub. Open-source, written in Rust
121–130 of 322 posts
Re: Show HN: Gitdot – A better GitHub. Open-source, written in Rust
#122Re: Show HN: Gitdot – A better GitHub. Open-source, written in Rust
#123[flagged]
This is unfair, and the vibe-coded swipe is unnecessary. Why would anyone continue working on a project if it's not seeing any adoption or interest? Many large successful apps were borne out of sharp pivots - Slack comes to mind.
Re: Show HN: Gitdot – A better GitHub. Open-source, written in Rust
#124[flagged]
Re: Show HN: Gitdot – A better GitHub. Open-source, written in Rust
#125Most people would also agree that building a better Github is not a super easy two-person task.
Re: Show HN: Gitdot – A better GitHub. Open-source, written in Rust
#126>As of now, all repositories are free, but we do envision charging for private repositories for teams in the future. Please don’t do this. Charge a fair price, in fact find a fair price and double it. I don’t want a free GitHub clone, I want one that works. How about 50$ 50 private repos, 50GBs of git LFS storage. Add collaborators for free. Actually respond to customers. At this level you only need 1000 paying custo…
Would you pledge in a crowd-funding campaign to build something like this? You'd want something that doesn't allow training on private repos, so ideally not a private company that can change owners and managers and hence policies over time. It's an interesting business case - open source website, revenue generating with some type of "open" business structure. Its first repos could be of itself. I had this idea for en…
Or, if we go a step further you pay a licensing fee for Gitdot and self host it.
The cookie jar of AI training data is very hard to resist even if it’s a non profit
I think 50$ is the minimum you could charge and still have responsive customer support.