Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm not sparring with you. You are wrong. Oberon is an operating system, and "Oberon is an operating system" is a fair and accurate statement. I don't expect you to relent on this—I'm too well acquainted. You're still wrong.
It is an OS. And it is also a programming language, which can run on other OSes as well as on its own native one. Here's a Windows version: https://blackboxframework.org/ Here's a Linux version too: https://blackbox.oberon.org/download Renamed, but "Component Pascal" is Oberon. Wirth's Oberon is a compiler, but Oberon can also be compiled with other compilers. Vishaps interpiles Oberon via C using GCC, Clang etc. htt…
> "Oberon is an operating system"
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47762184>
Claim #1:
> this is not correct
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47763595>
Claim #2:
> It is an OS.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47790959>
QED.
* * * *
> You are keen to rebut me
No, I'm really, really not. It would be great if you'd stick to wasting your own time in the future—or, better (esp. if you insist on involving others): only wasting the time of other people like you who would otherwise be doing harm elsewhere.