I'm color blind, and those colors look very similar to me. I could not tell if it was green or red or something else. Please use something like blue and red.
Show HN: Hacker Smacker – Spot great (and terrible) HN commenters at a glance
121–130 of 179 posts
Re: Show HN: Hacker Smacker – Spot great (and terrible) HN commenters at a glance
#122Putting aside questions of the second order effects this might have, I do like how it has that classic Newsblur styling.
Re: Show HN: Hacker Smacker – Spot great (and terrible) HN commenters at a glance
#123Hmm, I installed this in Waterfox for Android, and I don't appear to be able to tap on the bubbles next to people's usernames
Re: Show HN: Hacker Smacker – Spot great (and terrible) HN commenters at a glance
#124What’s the purpose? More echo chambers and circle jerking parties?! Why some people are so inclined to label others? I might dislike someone’s comment on something or disagree with their opinion about it, but absolutely love their comments on another topic. And if that is an “overall” score for a person’s comments, then who are you to hijack my personality and tell me this person is good or not to engage with? Unless…
Now the way I use the friend/foe system of labeling may be different than others, and it's a personal decision for how you choose to label commenters. But the way I do it, if somebody has an opinion that puts them on my red list, that's great to know, because when I see them comment elsewhere I now have the context for why I feel the way I do about them.
Re: Show HN: Hacker Smacker – Spot great (and terrible) HN commenters at a glance
#125I’d encourage a change of labels away from “friend/foe”. It may seem minor but the subtle loaded nature of those paired terms encourages an adversarial stance rather than one of productive discourse. It’s not catchy so there’s probably better than this but, just as an example— “engage/ignore” could better signal to the user a neutral “do I want to bother with this person?”
I like friend and foe far more than engage and ignore. A foe isnt someone you ignore. Ignoring is what builds bubbles. A foe can often be right even if you disagree.
I've used this extension for the past 15 years and I can say that I love seeing foes show up in threads. I still read their comments, but I know going into it that I can probably skip it after the first sentence if I recognize that it's more of what I disliked about them in the first place.
This is a time saving browser extension, freeing me up to scan more HN threads. I now often scan a thread to see if there's any friends, foes, or FoaFs inside.
Re: Show HN: Hacker Smacker – Spot great (and terrible) HN commenters at a glance
#126I’d encourage a change of labels away from “friend/foe”. It may seem minor but the subtle loaded nature of those paired terms encourages an adversarial stance rather than one of productive discourse. It’s not catchy so there’s probably better than this but, just as an example— “engage/ignore” could better signal to the user a neutral “do I want to bother with this person?”
I like friend and foe far more than engage and ignore. A foe isnt someone you ignore. Ignoring is what builds bubbles. A foe can often be right even if you disagree.
Re: Show HN: Hacker Smacker – Spot great (and terrible) HN commenters at a glance
#127Way down on my list of projects to vibe code is tags for HN users. I.e `Elon Stan` , `smart about aeronautics` , `grumpy` , `reasonable` etc etc. I like reading different opinion but if I formed an opinion about a user id like to record that without using my brain
Re: Show HN: Hacker Smacker – Spot great (and terrible) HN commenters at a glance
#128Thanks to the HN moderators for re-posting this after I posted this a few days ago. I only notice now that it's on the front page. Happy to answer any questions. Let me tell you, I've really enjoyed having those writers that I like highlighted on this comment thread because it makes it very easy to scan it. I think it's important to remember that this is not about hiding writers you disagree with. It's simply about m…
Re: Show HN: Hacker Smacker – Spot great (and terrible) HN commenters at a glance
#129That's weird, I'm reading HN every day and never felt a need for something like that. In my experience, the quality of comments is very high and really bad ones tend to be downvoted or flagged fast. Could this be a time zone issue such that people in certain time zones are less fortunate than others?
1. https://medium.com/incerto/the-most-intolerant-wins-the-dict...
Re: Show HN: Hacker Smacker – Spot great (and terrible) HN commenters at a glance
#130I’d encourage a change of labels away from “friend/foe”. It may seem minor but the subtle loaded nature of those paired terms encourages an adversarial stance rather than one of productive discourse. It’s not catchy so there’s probably better than this but, just as an example— “engage/ignore” could better signal to the user a neutral “do I want to bother with this person?”
I'm fine with friend or foe, because they are in reality, just coloured blobs