Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: Wikipedia as a doomscrollable social media feed

xikipedia.org

121–130 of 151 posts

Re: Show HN: Wikipedia as a doomscrollable social media feed

#121

I ran across a grammar mistake in one of the entries and clicked into the actual wikipedia entry to fix it. That was satisfying. Imagine being able to do that on social media.

Oh man, there are so many times I find myself wanting to click the edit button on websites that aren’t wikipedia to fix typos or other minor errors.

Re: Show HN: Wikipedia as a doomscrollable social media feed

#122

I've been waiting for someone to implement this well! I think in the future we might even have tiktok-style influencer videos generated from wikipedia content, who knows. I've been swiping a lot for the last 10 minutes and I'm not sure how much it's learning. I have some feedback. - I have never liked or clicked a biography but it keeps suggesting vast amounts of those - It does not seem to update the score based on…

It's opensource insofar that the javascript is not minified or obfuscated. You can see it at https://github.com/rebane2001/xikipedia too.

Perfect! Thanks for clarification. I thought there was server-side preparation of the content, but it seems from the other posts that it's all local, and I commend you for that.

Re: Show HN: Wikipedia as a doomscrollable social media feed

#123

- https://wikispeedruns.com/ - https://sixdegreesofwikipedia.com/ - https://www.wikitok.io/

I was not aware of WikiSpeedRuns, that's a fun one (and then the 2nd link you shared basically allows you to check how well you did)

Re: Show HN: Wikipedia as a doomscrollable social media feed

#124

Would be cool / horrific to do this, but then have AI influencer bots that teach you the things in influencer style click bait style videos.

Wait for the API costs or open-source models to be cheap enough and we'll get there. I mean it's a guaranteed HN frontpage (and currently also a guaranteed epic credit card bill).

Re: Show HN: Wikipedia as a doomscrollable social media feed

#125

I've been waiting for someone to implement this well! I think in the future we might even have tiktok-style influencer videos generated from wikipedia content, who knows. I've been swiping a lot for the last 10 minutes and I'm not sure how much it's learning. I have some feedback. - I have never liked or clicked a biography but it keeps suggesting vast amounts of those - It does not seem to update the score based on…

It's opensource insofar that the javascript is not minified or obfuscated. You can see it at https://github.com/rebane2001/xikipedia too.

I want to try reimplementing it for Wikipedia in another language, would you mind sharing how you went from the 400MB Wikipedia export to the .1x (40MB) file that is downloaded here?

Re: Show HN: Wikipedia as a doomscrollable social media feed

#127
post #86

I think what is interesting is that it is not necessarily the content of the brainrot that makes us underperform, but the act of swiping [0] and the context switching [1]. These attempts to make educational short form content still suffer from the same drawbacks, so I wonder how effective they truly are. [0] https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/33099 [1] https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/09658211.2025.252107…

I think it's "this one is good but if I swipe the next one can be even better", i.e. classic dopamine addiction. Stop digging!

This is it. Modern social media is a Skinner box. The context switching is a feature (short term dopamine hit in exchange for deep learning).

Re: Show HN: Wikipedia as a doomscrollable social media feed

#128
post #89

I don't get it. It shows the intro paragraph of some articles in card list and that's it? Clicking the card takes you away from the feed, instead of creating e.g. some kind of a path of interest.

> instead of creating e.g. some kind of a path of interest. You need to like them to update the weights of the algo, it works well

I just kept scrolling, hoping it would learn from how long I paused over content to read it the way FB's seems to, but it seems you're right, in this case "likes" are required.

Re: Show HN: Wikipedia as a doomscrollable social media feed

#129
post #86

I think what is interesting is that it is not necessarily the content of the brainrot that makes us underperform, but the act of swiping [0] and the context switching [1]. These attempts to make educational short form content still suffer from the same drawbacks, so I wonder how effective they truly are. [0] https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/33099 [1] https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/09658211.2025.252107…

I think it's "this one is good but if I swipe the next one can be even better", i.e. classic dopamine addiction. Stop digging!

i would place my money on the vast gap between effort and reward. you dont even need to think "if i swipe..." because the thought takes longer than the action. So why would you stop to consider what you might have to gain by swiping when you can literally swipe and find out faster than you can think about it?

Then you go about your regular day and suddenly everything feels harder in comparison. You have to think about what youre doing, you have to coordinate or plan your actions, you have to put work in. The swiping rots your ability to maintain and coordinate your chain of actions.

it weakens your ability to have intent.

Re: Show HN: Wikipedia as a doomscrollable social media feed

#130
The easiest way to break the mental barrier caused by short form content for me is to remind myself that knowing something is not the final product. The final product is trusting the knowledge and communicating that trust. Any information that finds itself to me without me asking for it is inherently less trustworthy and less communicable than information I hunted for with intention

Short form content feeds are like unloading a dumptruck full of random items into your driveway. Is it actually better if all that stuff you didnt ask for is real information that needs to be organized and pieced together with what you already know without any of the associated context that helps you do that? Or is it better if you know 99% of it is trash and you dont need to remember any of it?

I think a tool like this is great for people who want to use short form content intentionally, and personally that only happens when I am bored and in need of a new topic to research. I think of all short form content like marketing/ads, just showcasing something i might be interested to dig into on my own. It's how i used StumbleUpon website back in the day.

But I have noticed I am rarely using short form content with intention. its because i want to check what my friends have posted, and then with the extra downtime i scroll a little bit, and sometimes get stuck

Post reply on HN