A lot of my competitors who are still on the first page of Google results.
Show HN: Imagine a search engine that removed top million sites from its index
121–130 of 204 posts
Re: Show HN: Imagine a search engine that removed top million sites from its index
#122Re: Show HN: Imagine a search engine that removed top million sites from its index
#123 http://tazod.com/Re: Show HN: Imagine a search engine that removed top million sites from its index
#124Re: Show HN: Imagine a search engine that removed top million sites from its index
#125Is it safe to assume that this is how Google's search results would look if nobody did SEO?
I don't know how this engine ranks but I assume it's a similar system, they're just chopping a good portion of the results out. For what you said to be true, the top 10K/100K/1M rankings would have to be there entirely due to intervention from an SEO, and that's just not the case. The Wikipedia's of the world have enough going for them that they don't need SEO, so they'll always show up in Google, and never in this engine.
Re: Show HN: Imagine a search engine that removed top million sites from its index
#126Re: Show HN: Imagine a search engine that removed top million sites from its index
#127Re: Show HN: Imagine a search engine that removed top million sites from its index
#128It's interesting to see popularity used as an inverse corollary with quality. Imagine a TV that skipped the most popular programming (goodbye American Idol), or a radio station that only plays non-hits. Of course, there are great websites out there that are very popular (Wikipedia, NYTimes/WSJ, StackOverflow). I'd love to see a search engine with a better signal for quality than non-popularity (this search engine), o…