Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: Imagine a search engine that removed top million sites from its index

millionshort.com

121–130 of 204 posts

Re: Show HN: Imagine a search engine that removed top million sites from its index

#125

Is it safe to assume that this is how Google's search results would look if nobody did SEO?

No, not at all. Google is driven by many signals that SEOs try to optimize on, but the methodology is still the same. Top-ranking sites have high-quality sites linking to them, good content, and are supposed to not look spammy (though that's debatable).

I don't know how this engine ranks but I assume it's a similar system, they're just chopping a good portion of the results out. For what you said to be true, the top 10K/100K/1M rankings would have to be there entirely due to intervention from an SEO, and that's just not the case. The Wikipedia's of the world have enough going for them that they don't need SEO, so they'll always show up in Google, and never in this engine.

Re: Show HN: Imagine a search engine that removed top million sites from its index

#128

It's interesting to see popularity used as an inverse corollary with quality. Imagine a TV that skipped the most popular programming (goodbye American Idol), or a radio station that only plays non-hits. Of course, there are great websites out there that are very popular (Wikipedia, NYTimes/WSJ, StackOverflow). I'd love to see a search engine with a better signal for quality than non-popularity (this search engine), o…

Should be popular with hipsters.
Post reply on HN