Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: Glasses to detect smart-glasses that have cameras

github.com

111–120 of 207 posts

Re: Show HN: Glasses to detect smart-glasses that have cameras

#111
post #10

A much-needed project. Making yourself invisible to such privacy-invasive devices will be the need of the day. Of the two approaches you mentioned, blocking/jamming the specific wireless traffic would be pretty interesting, if possible.

> blocking/jamming the specific wireless traffic would be pretty interesting, if possible. And probably highly illegal.

[dead]

Re: Show HN: Glasses to detect smart-glasses that have cameras

#112
post #104

I look forward to the social media rage meltdown shorts that widespread adoption of this tech will precipitate. I think I'm kidding. I should be kidding. But I am curious... Question for people who resonate with this: whenever someone is holding their cellphone at an angle that "could be inferred" to be imaging you, how do you feel and think? I grew up on Earth before the cellpocalypse (phone zombies, etc), and went…

It's probably inevitable over time. "Smart" AR glasses that are indistinguishable from just a pair of regular glasses seem like something inevitable over the next decade or two.

is this the future we actually want????

or one that is truly inevitable and can’t be stopped?

Re: Show HN: Glasses to detect smart-glasses that have cameras

#113
post #112
post #104

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's probably inevitable over time. "Smart" AR glasses that are indistinguishable from just a pair of regular glasses seem like something inevitable over the next decade or two.

is this the future we actually want???? or one that is truly inevitable and can’t be stopped?

Want? I don't know. Outside of draconian regulation and punishment I don't see how you really stop aside from some level of social pressure/norms which can work to a degree. (No, you don't film/livestream the dinner party among friends that you are at.) People post photos from social events all the time. That ship has mostly sailed. Video and audio is mostly just an additional increment.

Re: Show HN: Glasses to detect smart-glasses that have cameras

#114
post #20

Taping over the recording indicator is illegal. Is there any way your device can find the MAC address of the glasses through bluetooth or something and file a lawsuit automatically?

it’s not illegal. meta raybans will detect the tape blocking a light sensor and not allow you take photos.

That is a feature Meta has implemented, but those protections were quickly defeated.

Re: Show HN: Glasses to detect smart-glasses that have cameras

#115

Interesting idea. It seems to me that most things which would need to be protected from hidden cameras would be stationary and not require the operator to mount the detectors on his body, but starting with mobile constraints is often helpful. I would like to draw attention to this gem of wit, easily the best I've seen in a long time: > I think the idea behind this approach is sound (actually it's light)

It's me. I want to be protected from hidden cameras from other peoples glasses.

... by using your own glasses with a hidden camera? Sounds like a good guy with a gun to stop a bad guy with a gun.

Re: Show HN: Glasses to detect smart-glasses that have cameras

#116
post #46
post #13

I remember seeing some celebrities in the late 00s / early 10s with IR-emitting sunglasses or accessories to flood the camera sensors of paparazzi and make it harder for photographers to get spyshots of them. Would this approach work for these camera glasses as well, simply flooding them with so much IR spectrum light that their sensors simply can't see you anymore?

I have been thinking of a device to thwart license plate readers by dumping a ton of IR and/or visible light on the plate before it gets read. Perhaps combined with some reflective coating? Retroreflectors are promising

Just as a heads up, this is likely illegal in many US states. (Legality is not morality - but it's good to know what the law is before you might break it).

Re: Show HN: Glasses to detect smart-glasses that have cameras

#117

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In the USA, at least, the right to record in public is protected by the First Amendment.

Private businesses, however, can choose to refuse service for any reason as long as it’s not discriminatory. If enough businesses collaborated to create a “no camera glasses” policy, people might be less likely to buy them. This could keep the market small. Perhaps a good approach would be to pressure businesses about this. Frankly they probably don’t want pervasive recording of their employees anyway.

I highly doubt that businesses will take a stand against these camera glasses. The kind of people that buy these smart glasses are usually a) wealthy, and b) not very frugal. What business would want to turn away the people with lots of money?

Re: Show HN: Glasses to detect smart-glasses that have cameras

#118
post #115

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's me. I want to be protected from hidden cameras from other peoples glasses.

... by using your own glasses with a hidden camera? Sounds like a good guy with a gun to stop a bad guy with a gun.

”I would feel pretty silly if my solution uses its own camera. So I'll be avoiding that.”

From the GitHub link.

Re: Show HN: Glasses to detect smart-glasses that have cameras

#119
post #79

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> toot sweet Not sure if intentional but just in case: the usual term is "tout de suite"

It might be in the original French, but it’s been anglicised and adopted as an English language term: https://www.oed.com/dictionary/toot-sweet_adv?tl=true

There's also the UK practice of deliberately mangling French for comedic effect, as in Del Boy's cries of "Bain Marie!" and "chateuneuf-de-paper!" on 1980s TV. Saying "Toot sweet" can fit right into that bucket.

Re: Show HN: Glasses to detect smart-glasses that have cameras

#120
post #79

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> toot sweet Not sure if intentional but just in case: the usual term is "tout de suite"

It might be in the original French, but it’s been anglicised and adopted as an English language term: https://www.oed.com/dictionary/toot-sweet_adv?tl=true

Quelle surprise (wink wink)!

This is the first time I've ever seen "toot sweet" used. The more you learn :)

Post reply on HN