A better command would be « how do i », that simply prompt chatgpt for an advice
https://pypi.org/project/howdoi/
Not gpt but could be added
Show HN: GPT-3 Powered Shell
111–114 of 114 posts
Re: Show HN: GPT-3 Powered Shell
#112Re: Show HN: GPT-3 Powered Shell
#113Earlier quoted context omitted.
Performance with auto transmission says less about the driver but more about the tech team. And yes, the point of these racing regulations is to make it at least optically a driver skill competition, not just who can throw more money at a pretty mundane challenge of getting from A to B the fastest. (If not for those regulations, since the track is known to the centimeter, the fastest driver would probably be the ligh…
> If not for those regulations, since the track is known to the centimeter, the fastest driver would probably be the lightest one because it would be dead weight. Maybe if everyone took turns setting times. But in a real race, you have to deal with traffic, figure out how to pass, etc.
> Maybe if everyone took turns setting times.
Time attack is a type of race. But anyway, if "other racing cars" is the only real variable it's hardly a challenge for autopilot software and the driver may as well be gone. Regulations exist since traditional mainstream audience may not find this show quite as engaging.
Again, the analogy is broken. Automatic transmission, full autopilot, these things would objectively help win the race (if make it boring), but creating good software is a little more involved than "who can type faster".
Re: Show HN: GPT-3 Powered Shell
#114Earlier quoted context omitted.
As soon as opt out is implemented training data will stop to grow and we're back to skills mattering
I know plenty of talented FOSS developers who won’t choose to opt out.
I doubt it. A FOSS developer would never consent to feed a closed proprietary model, which some corporation then charges other people for using, with their hard work.