Licenses are already out within hrs on HN?
The launch (to my mailing list of ~1200 people) actually started a day earlier and was 50% sold out when it became popular here.
Show HN: fman – file manager for programmers
111–120 of 216 posts
Re: Show HN: fman – file manager for programmers
#112Default key bindings kind of suck...but actually pretty useable once you've gone and overwridden those.
Here's some of my overrides:
[ { "keys": ["Ctrl+Enter"], "command": "copy" }, { "keys": ["Shift+Enter"], "command": "rename" }, { "keys": ["Ctrl+Shift+Enter"], "command": "move" }, { "keys": ["Left"], "command": "go_up" }, { "keys": ["Right"], "command": "open" }, { "keys": ["Enter"], "command": "open" }, { "keys": ["Alt+Enter"],"command":"open_with_editor"}, { "keys": ["Ctrl+Alt+T"], "command": "open_terminal"}, { "keys": ["Ctrl+Alt+Enter"], "command": "open_native_file_manager" } ]
Re: Show HN: fman – file manager for programmers
#113This broke apt-get update on my system, by adding an https update method. I assume the author must have apt-transport-https installed, or something.
Sorry about that :/ It adds /etc/apt/sources.list.d/fman.list so you can update fman with apt. Isn't non-https unsafe?
No, because the packages are already signed with gpg. That way you can verify the checksum already.
Re: Show HN: fman – file manager for programmers
#114Earlier quoted context omitted.
Sorry about that :/ It adds /etc/apt/sources.list.d/fman.list so you can update fman with apt. Isn't non-https unsafe?
No, because the packages are already signed with gpg. That way you can verify the checksum already.
Interesting (sorry, I'm new to Linux packaging). So would it be safe then to replace by http? (Not that I'd take this at face value, but I am interested in your opinion)
Re: Show HN: fman – file manager for programmers
#115> don't be a free user! sure, going to buy it > i'm sorry, we're sold out :-( 100 licenses were made available on March 1, and all are gone. guess i will be a free user :/
I'm sorry :( 1) I didn't expect to be sold out 2) I want to provide paying users with an awesome experience but need to be able to focus my resources to do that. I promise more licenses will be made available soon.
i totally understand your side. but you have to understand that the popup[0] that appears when i open fman without a license is really obnoxious. specially when i can't buy a license.
Re: Show HN: fman – file manager for programmers
#116Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm sorry :( 1) I didn't expect to be sold out 2) I want to provide paying users with an awesome experience but need to be able to focus my resources to do that. I promise more licenses will be made available soon.
i totally understand your side. but you have to understand that the popup[0] that appears when i open fman without a license is really obnoxious. specially when i can't buy a license. [0] http://i.imgur.com/m5uTyBe.png
You're right, I'm sorry. I'll find a solution. I saw you signed up for the waiting list. I'll get in touch.
Re: Show HN: fman – file manager for programmers
#117worth mentioning: sunflower[http://sunflower-fm.org/]
Re: Show HN: fman – file manager for programmers
#118Earlier quoted context omitted.
No, because the packages are already signed with gpg. That way you can verify the checksum already.
Interesting (sorry, I'm new to Linux packaging). So would it be safe then to replace by http? (Not that I'd take this at face value, but I am interested in your opinion)
Here's some more information that sums that up quite nicely, most default mirrors are http so I'd say it's safe enough.
http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/90227/why-there-is-n...
Re: Show HN: fman – file manager for programmers
#119Earlier quoted context omitted.
Interesting (sorry, I'm new to Linux packaging). So would it be safe then to replace by http? (Not that I'd take this at face value, but I am interested in your opinion)
Here's some more information that sums that up quite nicely, most default mirrors are http so I'd say it's safe enough. http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/90227/why-there-is-n...
Thanks!
Re: Show HN: fman – file manager for programmers
#120Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you mean fman then no: I thought about this long and hard but startup speed is crucial and Electron just doesn't cut it. It's based on PyQt. I wrote a blog post about this: https://fman.io/blog/picking-technologies-for-a-desktop-app-...
Good to hear that... It would have been even better if it was C++ Qt based.
Congratulations! You exemplify the term "pathological customer"!