I really like seeing the differences in responses between the models, its neat to see the intelligence on them.
Show HN: Are You in the Weights?
101–110 of 262 posts
Re: Show HN: Are You in the Weights?
#102Can you share the prompt you're using for each model?
Sure thing! It is the same prompt for every model in the rollouts, here it is No tools are available. Do not imply that you searched, looked up, browsed, or verified anything externally. If the name is ambiguous, return distinct likely people or entities rather than blending them. Do not invent entries to fill the list. Return only JSON. Return fewer than 8 if fewer credible matches exist. Return {"results":[]} if yo…
What if it doesn't return JSON?
Re: Show HN: Are You in the Weights?
#103I really like the website itself
I don't. It drops key presses and randomly moves the cursor on mobile, unless you type slowly.
Re: Show HN: Are You in the Weights?
#104Bahaha apparently only in their hallucinations. I’m not a professional rugby player or a neurologist.
Strange, there’s a neurosurgeon and Australian Rules Football player that share my uncommon name. I already knew about them from googling myself previously. Eerily similar!
Is there any reason to assume it wouldn't be? A lot of training data comes from the open web, after all, and Google also searches Google books, so a Google search is basically a model training data search.
The only interesting thing is how small the models have to be, to lose knowledge of you.
Re: Show HN: Are You in the Weights?
#105Only a fool would enter their name in this.
Right on, nobody will know my name as long as I don't search my name where other people can see it. My name is a secret.
I trust your real name is not actually Kyle Maxwell :) I do this too, btw - a random name generator is the very best form of internet anonymity.
(If it actually is your real name, then I can only assume you're using an iocaine powder strategy to beat the internet ...)
Re: Show HN: Are You in the Weights?
#106PRIVACY WARNING: Every name/text entered into this site is publicly listed on the "latest" leaderboard which seems to paginate endlessly.
Just deployed a fix for this; removed latest and capped pagination.
It is still possible to download all entries via the api and sort them by the timestamp. Removing the cursor data would be one way to mitigate this.
Currently there are a bit more than 43000 entries. As far as I have seen, only the results are stored. When I entered a random name, only a similar name was found, and that similar name result was stored, but not the original input.
Re: Show HN: Are You in the Weights?
#107Heh. That's what I get for having a weird name and having been on the internet since like 1993… https://www.intheweights.com/p/zellyn
Re: Show HN: Are You in the Weights?
#108When I tried this with a self-hosted Qwen model it hallucinated all kind of stuff about me being deeply involved with early Bitcoin development, conferences, and libraries.
Re: Show HN: Are You in the Weights?
#109I was thinking something like this two weeks ago in another thread[1]
>my Reddit history is part of every training set. It was taken without my consent. So now I'm immortal in a way, and hiding in the weights
Anyway 654 isn't horrible for the history still tied to me. That's in the top 6%[2]. It's interesting that it's non-deterministic, and the more keywords you add about yourself, the higher your score goes.
[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48403669
[2] https://www.intheweights.com/p/michael-mike-warot-ka9dgx-mrg...
Re: Show HN: Are You in the Weights?
#110Interesting one. It knows my internet handle, but when given my full name, it immediately starts hallucinating based on the name structure, guessing which country I'm from and whatnot.