I tried multiple times to upload a 1920x1080 video and export it as 1080 x 1920 for tik tok...but I couldn't do this, the last one was blocked at 75%, and it was an 30 seconds of 5 mb video..... I really need this website if everything works well!
Show HN: VidStudio, a browser based video editor that doesn't upload your files
101–110 of 120 posts
Re: Show HN: VidStudio, a browser based video editor that doesn't upload your files
#102Glad you're holding the "nothing leaves your machine" line. A lot of tools in adjacent categories added cloud sync early, the local audience didn't come back. If you can keep v1 and v2 fully client side you'll find the people who care. ffmpeg-on-wasm will hit a memory ceiling on longer videos, but most people opening a browser video editor are doing short clips anyway.
Re: Show HN: VidStudio, a browser based video editor that doesn't upload your files
#103The hvc1 and 10-bit failures a few comments up aren't a FFmpeg-wasm fallback thing, they're a WebCodecs browser-gap. Firefox's HEVC path is partial and 10-bit paths are worse. Chrome mostly works and Firefox fails on the exact files iPhones and modern Androids record by default. A "your browser can't decode this codec, try Chrome" nudge would probably spare people the bounce, especially on test imports from their pho…
Re: Show HN: VidStudio, a browser based video editor that doesn't upload your files
#104Looks good. Good work on shipping! I love seeing video applications utilizing Web Assembly. However, it usually falls short in when it comes to longer video in the browser's sandboxed environment. How is the performance? Curious if you've tried using the FFmpeg libraries directly (libav), rather than compiling all of FFMpeg to WASM? I always end up using running FFmpeg directly since it's faster and more reliable, bu…
Re: Show HN: VidStudio, a browser based video editor that doesn't upload your files
#105Congrats on shipping this! I went down the same path for videotobe.com, fully client-side with ffmpeg.wasm, and it fell over on longer videos. The memory ceiling and encode times pushed me to a cloud processing pipeline. You've managed to solve both, the WebCodecs plus Pixi plus ffmpeg.wasm split looks like the right decomposition in hindsight.I processed 3+ hrs of media using VidStudio and it held up. Nicely done!
Re: Show HN: VidStudio, a browser based video editor that doesn't upload your files
#106I am really attracted to the idea of local running in-browser tools, since the website is then used only as a distribution medium which is super easy to use. And I really need such a tool, I was eager to test it. However on both my first and second try it failed. I tried to import a video clip recorded on a Pixel phone. In Firefox it failed with a following message: "Your browser does not support the codec "hvc1.2.4.…
Re: Show HN: VidStudio, a browser based video editor that doesn't upload your files
#107I love no accounts and no cloud a lot! Wondering if it support subtitle and transcript? It would be helpful for non-native speaker use case. Also, can you talk more about the use case difference between VidStudio vs. Finalcut/Imovie/Premiere? I am quite interested. Thanks
Re: Show HN: VidStudio, a browser based video editor that doesn't upload your files
#108What is the performance difference between native FFmpeg and WebAssembly-translated FFmpeg running in a web browser?
Re: Show HN: VidStudio, a browser based video editor that doesn't upload your files
#109Price?
Re: Show HN: VidStudio, a browser based video editor that doesn't upload your files
#110This is so cool - will try it out. Pure browser based video editing is ambitious. Are you using Remotion ?