Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: Lorem Picsum – Lorem Ipsum but for photos

picsum.photos

101–110 of 128 posts

Re: Show HN: Lorem Picsum – Lorem Ipsum but for photos

#101

Tangentially, I got tired of Lorem Ipsum text and created Quantum Lorem Ipsum, now with 100% more physics jargon. http://neil.panchal.io/articles/quantum-lorem-ipsum/ https://github.com/neilpanchal/quantum-lorem-ipsum Edit: Created a Github repo

I'm partial to Bacon Ipsum https://baconipsum.com

Re: Show HN: Lorem Picsum – Lorem Ipsum but for photos

#103
post #61

I'm honestly surprised I haven't seen a placeholder service that serves up ads in the images. The service gets revenue, and the dev gets something that's obviously not a final product.

Placeholders are meant to have no 'message'. In general, ads have messages. Might be a bit difficult to find common ground.

Re: Show HN: Lorem Picsum – Lorem Ipsum but for photos

#104

Just wanted to comment on the clarity and effectiveness of the home page. Love it! So many user-friendly checkboxes are ticked off. Nice look, great description, plenty of examples, advanced usage section that's very easy to take in, credits at the bottom with some backend tech used, a welcoming contact link... All of this accomplished (landing page and documentation) in just a few scrolls of the mouse. I went from n…

seconded. very clear and easy to use. good design and nice idea!

Re: Show HN: Lorem Picsum – Lorem Ipsum but for photos

#105
post #61

I'm honestly surprised I haven't seen a placeholder service that serves up ads in the images. The service gets revenue, and the dev gets something that's obviously not a final product.

I wonder if an ad company will now get the idea to purchase picsum and (eventually) serve ads.

Re: Show HN: Lorem Picsum – Lorem Ipsum but for photos

#106

Earlier quoted context omitted.

oh, god, no! what an ugly, absurd and unnecessary over-engineering

Ugly yes, over engineering? no it's what you would have done in PHP in the 90's. Doing the URL thing would need more work (hello .htaccess). Anyway... Good points: It is semantically correct and self documenting. There is no resource called 300 nested under a resource called 200 so lets not pretend there is. The query string seems perfect for the job of providing size parameters. You can then extend this interface to…

Add to this the fact that you don’t have to memorize which order the “parameters” go.

Is it `/width/height` or `/height/width`?

To me this is very similar to languages that use names parameters vs positional.

Re: Show HN: Lorem Picsum – Lorem Ipsum but for photos

#107

Just wanted to comment on the clarity and effectiveness of the home page. Love it! So many user-friendly checkboxes are ticked off. Nice look, great description, plenty of examples, advanced usage section that's very easy to take in, credits at the bottom with some backend tech used, a welcoming contact link... All of this accomplished (landing page and documentation) in just a few scrolls of the mouse. I went from n…

[deleted]

Re: Show HN: Lorem Picsum – Lorem Ipsum but for photos

#110
post #69

Earlier quoted context omitted.

On the flipside, maybe this version better emulates (a subset of) technical writing? So if you're tuning the design of e.g. a book or thesis, this is more representative than actual Lorem Ipsum?

I'm going to draw a hard line and say No. There is no subset of writing that produces anything that looks like this.

Not even "the set of science-based Lorem Ipsum knockoffs," huh?
Post reply on HN