101–110 of 207 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I believe environments auto-eject those people who do not belong there anyway, the reason does not matter.
So if you end up being ejected from a group it was justified because you didn't belong there. Nice logic.
Where's the legal contract part? If my video is leaked by the other party, I'd like to at least have a clear contract so I can issue takedown notices, sue for copyright damages, etc. (Edit: Not a new idea, certainly, but well executed so far.)
I'm pretty sure leaking a sex video without consent is already illegal in most countries. And you can sue the other party for a lot more severe crimes than copyright damages.
I can't speak to other countries specifics, but in the US the most effective avenue currently appears to be copyright claims. That's a civil proceeding, so the jilted ex is only on the hook for financial penalties.
http://www.criminaldefenselawyer.com/resources/revenge-porn-...
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I believe environments auto-eject those people who do not belong there anyway, the reason does not matter.
So if you end up being ejected from a group it was justified because you didn't belong there. Nice logic.
This is a really cool concept. But ultimately you cannot get past the analog hole. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analog_hole
From the FAQs: > How do I know my partner won't abuse my trust? > You can't. However with Rumuki you have the discretion to only grant playbacks when you can keep an eye on them. You also have the option to revoke all playback grants and delete the recording if trust is ever lost.
If you do trust the other party, I don't see how this app adds anything but complications. Don't get me wrong, I guess there are some practical applications for the underlying technology and from the looks of it, this seems pretty well engineered and designed. The advertised use case just does not make any sense to me at all.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't get the point of sextapes. I have excellent recall, so why do I need a video record?
I don't get the point of handcuffs in the bedroom, but some people like them, so that's up to them. If you don't understand someone's sexual preference, the correct response is no response. You're not obligated to comment on everything.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
From the FAQs: > How do I know my partner won't abuse my trust? > You can't. However with Rumuki you have the discretion to only grant playbacks when you can keep an eye on them. You also have the option to revoke all playback grants and delete the recording if trust is ever lost.
Which completely eliminates the use for this app. At least in the sense it is marketed for. If you only want to show the movie when you keep an eye on the one you're showing it to, just show it from your own phone. But I guess the whole point of sexy movies is to be able to watch them away from your partner. If you do trust the other party, I don't see how this app adds anything but complications. Don't get me wrong,…
Are you kidding me? How will you get funded?
But, worse, it makes it sound like it's only something you should use if you don't trust the other person.
Instead, they should market it as "2fa for sex tapes" rather than a trust issue by itself and point to things like "the fappening" icloud social engineering hack.
I can't imagine many people using this otherwise.
Also, don't forget that your target audience is mostly women who bear the majority of the shaming for a leaked video instead of high-fives. "Don't be the next Jennifer Lawrence" is going to be more effective marketing.