If you've written this, presumably you've found something lacking in the other eight billion Lua/C++ bindings (I agree, they all have major deficiencies, such that Luabind remains my "least bad" choice). Could you explain exactly what yours does differently?
Could you elaborate on common deficiencies? What does Luabind get right? What are its shortcomings?
Luabind is terrible to install. The most up-to-date version (https://github.com/rpavlik/luabind) is nowhere to be found on the first three pages of Google results for 'luabind'. It requires and builds with Boost, with all the attendant package version conflicts - for example, the Luabind package for Ubuntu 14.04 has the two-year-old Boost 1.54 as a dependency, which typically conflicts with newer Boosts from PPAs. And for some reason the github source generates a library called libluabindd.so, with a spurious extra 'd' which requires symlinking to libluabind before stuff will build against it.
It's a shame, because the library itself is intuitive and reliable, but building it is just painful.