Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: Moadim.io – A scheduler for agents

moadim.io

11–20 of 24 posts

Re: Show HN: Moadim.io – A scheduler for agents

#11

How do I know this won't just eat through my token budget? It's hard to understand from the website how "done" is derived in the loop. If it's not deterministic then it seems like it would be prone to over-engineering.

Would this be where llm/agentic observability come into play?

Re: Show HN: Moadim.io – A scheduler for agents

#12

How do I know this won't just eat through my token budget? It's hard to understand from the website how "done" is derived in the loop. If it's not deterministic then it seems like it would be prone to over-engineering.

Would this be where llm/agentic observability come into play?

I don’t think this is where it’s should land, I believe that is not the “single responsibility” of this project but I would love to hear more, because it’s seems like a pain point for several people, what is your suggestion?

Re: Show HN: Moadim.io – A scheduler for agents

#14
post #13

I think the actual loop engineering lives in skills and workflows. The trigger is the creation of a ticket, manual or programmatic; e.g., through an incident.

Your perspective here is of a software engineer only, and I gets it, for software engineering you got a great point and I somewhat agree with it. When we talk about how to work with agent the holy grail is agent’s pro-activity, one of the columns of pro activity is webhooks as you said “the creation of a ticket”, I don’t want to attack this vector, I what to be laser focus on the scheduling vector as I said in another comment here.

Regarding skill and workflows, I don’t want to make you couple your way of work to the routine, if you want to load the the workflows and skills feel free, in the end of the day the routine is only a scheduled prompt.

Would love to hear more about your way of working with event driven actions

Post reply on HN