Show HN: 35k+ paper psychedelic library that knows LSD from Lumpy Skin Disease
11–14 of 14 posts
Re: Show HN: 35k+ paper psychedelic library that knows LSD from Lumpy Skin Disease
#12I built an open library for psychedelic and consciousness research that pulls from over a dozen academic APIs every 20 minutes, dedupes them, organizes by relevance, and synthesizes evidence. I just finished my master's in Psychedelics and Consciousness Studies, and built the library I wanted while studying. I started it over a year ago, but put it down until my practicum advisor suggested I dust it off and go hard o…
Technical question: Is Gemini not as good at rifling through paper citations? I would think Google scholar would be a moat of sorts for Goog, but maybe every LLM has roughly equal access to it now?
Research question: Did you find any mind-blowing results with your awesome new tool?
Development question: Do you plan on extending this beyond just a search apparatus? I would personally love to have a "factoid list" that actually cites interesting factoids from each article and can link to the source document -- although that is probably a "don't bite off more than you can chew" juncture and what you have is already excellent. But a thought. In case you're interested in expanding on it.
Re: Show HN: 35k+ paper psychedelic library that knows LSD from Lumpy Skin Disease
#13I built an open library for psychedelic and consciousness research that pulls from over a dozen academic APIs every 20 minutes, dedupes them, organizes by relevance, and synthesizes evidence. I just finished my master's in Psychedelics and Consciousness Studies, and built the library I wanted while studying. I started it over a year ago, but put it down until my practicum advisor suggested I dust it off and go hard o…
So freakin' cool. Overjoyed by your efforts here. I notice when I search for certain different words like "brahmavihara" or just "vihara" sometimes I get different results due to slight differences in the titles of papers. But that might be a feature and not a bug [if there were many papers, for example]. Technical question: Is Gemini not as good at rifling through paper citations? I would think Google scholar would…
Search observation: What you're noticing with search is the currently intended behavior, but you raise an interesting point. I'm using tsvector for Postgres full-text search over title, abstract, etc. with prefix matching, specifically in English. The stemmer doesn't decompose Sanskrit so "brahmavihara" and "vihara" are separate tokens matching legitimately separate papers. Then it falls back to the embedding geometry to search by meaning instead of strings.
That said, there's enough Sanskrit going on in contemplative papers that a synonym/variant layer for Pali and Sanskrit vocabulary is a pretty good idea. There's a lot of German and Portugese in the corpus as well, so upgrading the search to account for all these languages is a great feature idea.
Tech question: There's actually zero LLM involvement at all regarding citations or references in this project. That all comes from OpenAlex API. LLMs only do relevance gating, study detail abstraction, and evidence synthesis summaries.
Google has a moat in the sense they have no API and don't license anything to anyone, so nobody builds on it and the open ecosystem of sources I'm using is the same as what AI products use. Gemini is trained on the same sources this library uses (and recently, this library itself) and the Google Scholar vault is in my opinion, pretty useless given the open ecosystem available.
Research question: the most mind-blowing results I've discovered are in an unexpected direction - it is wild how thin and low-confidence the evidence is for basically any claim regarding psychedelics, due primarily to functional unblinding and low sample size and diversity. The hype cycle is way beyond science can keep grounded.
Here's an example (disclaimer, it's my own published research!): A recent study reported an effect size for mebufotenin exceeding the theoretical maximum for antidepressants, implying methodological issues account for the results. https://consciousnesslibrary.org/research/52248-blinding-int...
Another "mind-blowing" observation is the sheer volume of consciousness work outside the psychedelic hype cycle. A full half of the corpus is on meditation or philosophy of mind, not related to psychedelics. And we still are so far from understanding the "hard problem.
Development question: I have plans to extend this indefinitely, and your factoid idea is interesting. The "study at a glance" might have most of what you're asking about already on each article, but taking that a step further, it could be cool to have a cross-corpus browsable feed of those. I'll also be integrating data from a project by Josie Kins (maker of https://effectindex.com) on psychedelic substance topics in particular for dose info and potentially trip reports, but that's a little orthogonal to what you're suggesting.
Let me know if you mean something more about factoids than the "study at a glance" and the potential to have those be aggregated in a browsable way and I'll see what I can think of.
I haven't bit off more than I can chew yet, my plan is to work on it until that's the case OR there's just nothing left to do in the scope of the project.
Thanks a lot for your comment!
Re: Show HN: 35k+ paper psychedelic library that knows LSD from Lumpy Skin Disease
#14This looks solid, great to have a site like this focused specifically on psychedelic vertical