Show HN: GentleOS – A pair of hobby OSes for vintage 32-bit and 16-bit PCs
11–20 of 112 posts
Re: Show HN: GentleOS – A pair of hobby OSes for vintage 32-bit and 16-bit PCs
#12> A hobby operating system for vintage 32-bit PCs. I am all in favour of great projects, but why a differentiation between 32-bits or 64-bits? I don't understand that. Is a computer that is 32 bit or 64 bit, either way which, not worthy? Edit: I understand a motivation if it is on simplicity choosing one or the other, but other than that I don't see why that should ever be a goal worthy to be pursued. Software should…
Re: Show HN: GentleOS – A pair of hobby OSes for vintage 32-bit and 16-bit PCs
#13Re: Show HN: GentleOS – A pair of hobby OSes for vintage 32-bit and 16-bit PCs
#14> A hobby operating system for vintage 32-bit PCs. I am all in favour of great projects, but why a differentiation between 32-bits or 64-bits? I don't understand that. Is a computer that is 32 bit or 64 bit, either way which, not worthy? Edit: I understand a motivation if it is on simplicity choosing one or the other, but other than that I don't see why that should ever be a goal worthy to be pursued. Software should…
> Edit: I understand a motivation if it is on simplicity choosing one or the other, but other than that I don't see why that should ever be a goal worthy to be pursued. Software should really "just work" no matter the number of bits and bytes.
Not really how software works.
Re: Show HN: GentleOS – A pair of hobby OSes for vintage 32-bit and 16-bit PCs
#15Re: Show HN: GentleOS – A pair of hobby OSes for vintage 32-bit and 16-bit PCs
#16[flagged]
Re: Show HN: GentleOS – A pair of hobby OSes for vintage 32-bit and 16-bit PCs
#17> A hobby operating system for vintage 32-bit PCs. I am all in favour of great projects, but why a differentiation between 32-bits or 64-bits? I don't understand that. Is a computer that is 32 bit or 64 bit, either way which, not worthy? Edit: I understand a motivation if it is on simplicity choosing one or the other, but other than that I don't see why that should ever be a goal worthy to be pursued. Software should…
“Vintage” 64 bit PC’s aren’t a thing. > Edit: I understand a motivation if it is on simplicity choosing one or the other, but other than that I don't see why that should ever be a goal worthy to be pursued. Software should really "just work" no matter the number of bits and bytes. Not really how software works.
Just sold my SGI Indigo 2 for 900 $ ! Vintage 64 bit is absolutely a thing. :-)
Re: Show HN: GentleOS – A pair of hobby OSes for vintage 32-bit and 16-bit PCs
#18> A hobby operating system for vintage 32-bit PCs. I am all in favour of great projects, but why a differentiation between 32-bits or 64-bits? I don't understand that. Is a computer that is 32 bit or 64 bit, either way which, not worthy? Edit: I understand a motivation if it is on simplicity choosing one or the other, but other than that I don't see why that should ever be a goal worthy to be pursued. Software should…
32 is vintager vintage
Re: Show HN: GentleOS – A pair of hobby OSes for vintage 32-bit and 16-bit PCs
#19Earlier quoted context omitted.
“Vintage” 64 bit PC’s aren’t a thing. > Edit: I understand a motivation if it is on simplicity choosing one or the other, but other than that I don't see why that should ever be a goal worthy to be pursued. Software should really "just work" no matter the number of bits and bytes. Not really how software works.
> “Vintage” 64 bit PC’s aren’t a thing. Just sold my SGI Indigo 2 for 900 $ ! Vintage 64 bit is absolutely a thing. :-)