Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: Audiomass – a free, open-source multitrack audio editor for the web

audiomass.co

11–20 of 130 posts

Re: Show HN: Audiomass – a free, open-source multitrack audio editor for the web

#15
post #9

This is great. I need to do audio work this coming week and was dreading Audacity.

when have you last tried audacity? it's been getting friendlier

How much work would it be to compile Audacity for the web?

(I'm a bit behind on web technologies nowadays)

Re: Show HN: Audiomass – a free, open-source multitrack audio editor for the web

#17
post #9

This is great. I need to do audio work this coming week and was dreading Audacity.

when have you last tried audacity? it's been getting friendlier

Agreed but it’s still not a proper DAW and suffers from those limitations. It gets very rickety when you go beyond a basic stereo mix.

Re: Show HN: Audiomass – a free, open-source multitrack audio editor for the web

#18
post #14

what is the theoretical file size / project size limit? what happens when the browser crashes?

I usually use it to edit audio tracks quickly up to 10 minutes long, though I have received nice emails from people who have used for 1hr+ podcasts successfully (though certain heavy operations wouldn't be very fun to use).

For multitrack sessions, there is the ability to export to a .amss file that contains all the settings, markers, tracks etc. For single track edit... it would just crash right now. There is already a feature for caching audio tracks in indexeddb (it's under >File), but honestly it's not a web api I have found to be super reliable. I don't blame the browser developers, because I 'm sure if it was more reliable certain websites would put it to use storing gigabytes of trackers on the user's machine :). For this reason, I haven't made it auto-save the session automatically yet, trying to be a good citizen on the user's computer, maybe that will change in the future if there's a strong need for it.

Also, right now there is no backend, once it loads there are no more requests made to the server, so it's bound to frontend limitations. This is by design, I want it to be an app that respects users, doesn't upload or leak information, no ads, etc, even if it means getting a small hit in functionality in other areas.

I think of it like photopea/pixlr are to photoshop. Quick and easy to use, get you at 90% of the way. If somebody wants to do a serious operation, then by all means go for a paid desktop pro-daw solution :)

edit: reason

Re: Show HN: Audiomass – a free, open-source multitrack audio editor for the web

#19
post #9

This is great. I need to do audio work this coming week and was dreading Audacity.

Try Ocenaudio - I’ve used pretty much every audio editor free and paid for and this is my go to for a free editor.

I also cannot understand why anyone would recommend Audacity.

Post reply on HN