Show HN: A working reference implementation of context engineering
11–20 of 21 posts
Re: Show HN: A working reference implementation of context engineering
#12Re: Show HN: A working reference implementation of context engineering
#13Putting engineering after a term doesnt make it engineering.
Software engineering is certainly not engineering. Even at the highest levels. Real engineering have infinitely more complex interactions in the physical world than symbolic institutions for machines.
Re: Show HN: A working reference implementation of context engineering
#14Re: Show HN: A working reference implementation of context engineering
#15I don’t really think this reflects the current era of challenges? The “enforcement layer” is the hardest and most important part, and is barely addressed. - is the answer structurally / syntactically valid? - is it appropriately grounded and evidenced? - is it accurate? In what ways does it fall short? Each of these should be triggering an agent to rework and resubmit etc. or failing that a disclosure to the user abo…
Re: Show HN: A working reference implementation of context engineering
#16[flagged]
Re: Show HN: A working reference implementation of context engineering
#17No numbers/measurements/benchmarks and you dare call it "a working" one? Any real proofs that this 'works'?
Re: Show HN: A working reference implementation of context engineering
#18I don’t really think this reflects the current era of challenges? The “enforcement layer” is the hardest and most important part, and is barely addressed. - is the answer structurally / syntactically valid? - is it appropriately grounded and evidenced? - is it accurate? In what ways does it fall short? Each of these should be triggering an agent to rework and resubmit etc. or failing that a disclosure to the user abo…
[flagged]