Earlier quoted context omitted.
does it matter?
Yeah it does. If you're happy routing your personal data through software that lacks an author who fully understands what the software does, good for you. Suggesting that this doesn't matter in general is.. not an opinion I'd share publicly.
Show HN: Mtproto.zig – High-performance Telegram proxy with DPI evasion
11–18 of 18 posts
Re: Show HN: Mtproto.zig – High-performance Telegram proxy with DPI evasion
#12Re: Show HN: Mtproto.zig – High-performance Telegram proxy with DPI evasion
#13There are some useful ideas from SoftEtherVPN, BitTorrent, Yggdrasil Network, and Tor you could borrow, if you're looking to improve this. The ideal tunneling solution, which doesn't exist yet, is one that not only evades DPI, but also onion bounces you through nodes in a decentralized ad hoc network, and does automatic node discovery.
Re: Show HN: Mtproto.zig – High-performance Telegram proxy with DPI evasion
#14Cool project. But why tunnel Telegram specifically? This could be a yet another VPN protocol. There are some useful ideas from SoftEtherVPN, BitTorrent, Yggdrasil Network, and Tor you could borrow, if you're looking to improve this. The ideal tunneling solution, which doesn't exist yet, is one that not only evades DPI, but also onion bounces you through nodes in a decentralized ad hoc network, and does automatic node…
Thanks OP for this!
Re: Show HN: Mtproto.zig – High-performance Telegram proxy with DPI evasion
#15Re: Show HN: Mtproto.zig – High-performance Telegram proxy with DPI evasion
#16Cool project. But why tunnel Telegram specifically? This could be a yet another VPN protocol. There are some useful ideas from SoftEtherVPN, BitTorrent, Yggdrasil Network, and Tor you could borrow, if you're looking to improve this. The ideal tunneling solution, which doesn't exist yet, is one that not only evades DPI, but also onion bounces you through nodes in a decentralized ad hoc network, and does automatic node…
Nowadays I prefer to have dedicated application solutions, everybody (with security in mind) has some sort of base WG/Tailscale setup, it's annoying to tweak to incorporate those on top, so per-program solution imo makes sense and especially in the AI era where you don't really want to allow agents to tamper with your main network card config, it's safer and cleaner. Thanks OP for this!
Re: Show HN: Mtproto.zig – High-performance Telegram proxy with DPI evasion
#17Does this still blend in well with normal HTTPS traffic?