11–20 of 34 posts
Huh, interesting... why have both React components and Mustache-style templates in the same framework? They perform the same function? What's the use case for mixing them?
You can read https://lukeb42.github.io/vertex-interop.html for more info.
I was going to say that font is unreadable, but its Courier New. By my own extensive testing[1], it's optimal at minimum 18px, you're at 13.5px. [1]: https://github.com/Diablo-D3/dotfiles/blob/master/fontsizes....
Beauty /is/ in the eye of the beholder. The rationale /here/ is that the more text in a page the more code you'll fit in your head the more you'll get done, the more confidence you'll have and again the more you'll achieve.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Beauty /is/ in the eye of the beholder. The rationale /here/ is that the more text in a page the more code you'll fit in your head the more you'll get done, the more confidence you'll have and again the more you'll achieve.
OP has a valid point. On my Mac, it's unreadable without zooming in. I immediately left the page.
Send me a screenshot via https://catbox.moe if it's unreadable and I'll get this done and dusted before leaving the thread. Thanks.
I was going to say that font is unreadable, but its Courier New. By my own extensive testing[1], it's optimal at minimum 18px, you're at 13.5px. [1]: https://github.com/Diablo-D3/dotfiles/blob/master/fontsizes....
(“Courier”, as provided by macOS, is fine. But Courier New is irredeemably bad.)
Concerning font-family declarations, if you’re doing something like `"Courier New", Courier, monospace`—please just write `monospace`.
(I’m not going to address the font size.)
A bit surprised to see a new framework boasting to ship as UMD. Are developers still using commonjs? I'm sure some continue to CDN inject libraries. But even then ESM is well supported.
A bit surprised to see a new framework boasting to ship as UMD. Are developers still using commonjs? I'm sure some continue to CDN inject libraries. But even then ESM is well supported.
Yes, and every other flavor too. "Developers" isn't a single hive-mind entity, and there are many different purposes for javascript, and many different kinds of systems where javascript can be used.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Zero code is in your head if you can't read it. The predominant monitor in existence is your average 24" 1080p monitor, sat at, on average, 32" away from the head. The average person has worse than 20/20 vision. You must test your website in such conditions and make sure it is readable, and also make sure it meets at minimum WCAG A, but preferably the whole way to AAA if possible.
Thank you but the predominant monitor's probably a smartphone. The average professional is probably using a 4k monitor at the moment. Everything in the free documentation I've provided you out of my own time and money that you're referring to exists in relation to the other elements in that page, so to get the experience you're after simply ctrl+scroll and change the CSS zoom level like the riot at parties that you c…
If you really don't care about providing an accessible experience, try this: no one will use the tool if they can't read the docs. With my monitor and eyesight, it's entirely illegible.