Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: Rust compiler in PHP emitting x86-64 executables

github.com

11–20 of 58 posts

Re: Show HN: Rust compiler in PHP emitting x86-64 executables

#12

[flagged]

Why do we assume this was created with AI? Is there some marker we can use to detect that?

The amount of code committed per day suggest some kind of automation.

Also, a passionate programmer usually will add a "why this exists" in his readme.

I'd be very surprised if this wasn't AI.

Re: Show HN: Rust compiler in PHP emitting x86-64 executables

#13

[flagged]

Why are you assuming this was AI? It doesn't show any obvious indications of being AI. Maybe this is just someone's random side project. I advise you against jumping to conclusions.

Prove me wrong :)

Re: Show HN: Rust compiler in PHP emitting x86-64 executables

#14

[flagged]

Why are you assuming this was AI? It doesn't show any obvious indications of being AI. Maybe this is just someone's random side project. I advise you against jumping to conclusions.

Just look at the commit cadance, the bulk of the 8k lines of code was added in a couple of hours. Most commits 2-4 minutes apart. This is 100% vibe coded and it's pretty obvious.

> It doesn't show any obvious indications of being AI.

I agree that he probably asked the AI to omit some common AI tells, like excessive comments, verbose readmes etc.

Re: Show HN: Rust compiler in PHP emitting x86-64 executables

#17
post #3

Sometimes when doing offensive security work you end up in the strangest environments with limited tools, odd quirks, broken shells, and god knows what else. But you know what is almost always available and just works? PHP.

Nop. awk, bash or some POSIX shell certainly. Perl most likely, despite it’s plunge in popularity. On a modern Mac, awk, bash and Perl are preinstalled with the system. PHP is not even necessarily present at system level on a PHP dev box as it might be only installed in some container.

Re: Show HN: Rust compiler in PHP emitting x86-64 executables

#18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why are you assuming this was AI? It doesn't show any obvious indications of being AI. Maybe this is just someone's random side project. I advise you against jumping to conclusions.

Just look at the commit cadance, the bulk of the 8k lines of code was added in a couple of hours. Most commits 2-4 minutes apart. This is 100% vibe coded and it's pretty obvious. > It doesn't show any obvious indications of being AI. I agree that he probably asked the AI to omit some common AI tells, like excessive comments, verbose readmes etc.

People are weird, I for one started to use em dash more often — look at me!
Post reply on HN