11–20 of 27 posts
I am curious why it’s called DAW. There are no screenshots so hard to say anything Does it support VST, AU? Any support for midi? Which OS’s supported? Is this just a multi tracker recorder that has a git style storage?
in the context of computer-based recording it's pretty common jargon
I'm a voice actor, and I live in Reaper -- it's my "IDE" as it were. I like the idea of the git branching metaphor. Would you say that your DAW is primarily for musicians, or for more general purpose recording (i.e. a voice actors workflow)
You charge $10/mo but all your links for Documentation/Privacy/Terms/Support are blank.
I am curious why it’s called DAW. There are no screenshots so hard to say anything Does it support VST, AU? Any support for midi? Which OS’s supported? Is this just a multi tracker recorder that has a git style storage?
Digital Audio Workstation in the context of computer-based recording it's pretty common jargon
I’m not expecting a whole Ableton replacement, but things like hosting plugins and working with MIDI is IMO fair to expect from any piece of software that wants to call itself a DAW.
I’d recommend providing a lot more screenshots and information about how the core DAW functionality works in comparison to other DAWs. As is I can’t see enough about what this would feel like to spend my time downloading and trying it
nice feedback. I'll get on that! Thanks
The versioning idea is interesting and something many musicians have to contend with as they work on songs. Personally, I wouldn't want the complexity of take-level versioning, but pinning audio and mix automation to a given mixdown could be useful for tracking the history of a song. It might be more effective to approach this as version tracking / collaboration layer around existing DAW formats rather than a full replacement.