Cool to see lots of people independently come to "CLIs are all you need". I'm still not sure if it's a short-term bandaid because agents are so good at terminal use or if it's part of a longer term trend but it's definitely felt much more seamless to me then MCPs. (my one of many contribution https://github.com/caesarnine/binsmith )
Show HN: Webctl – Browser automation for agents based on CLI instead of MCP
11–20 of 43 posts
Re: Show HN: Webctl – Browser automation for agents based on CLI instead of MCP
#12is there a benchmark? there are a lot of scraping agents nowdays..
An objective benchmark is a great idea, especially to compare webctl against other similar CLI-based tools. I'll definitely look into how to set that up.
Re: Show HN: Webctl – Browser automation for agents based on CLI instead of MCP
#13Cool to see lots of people independently come to "CLIs are all you need". I'm still not sure if it's a short-term bandaid because agents are so good at terminal use or if it's part of a longer term trend but it's definitely felt much more seamless to me then MCPs. (my one of many contribution https://github.com/caesarnine/binsmith )
Re: Show HN: Webctl – Browser automation for agents based on CLI instead of MCP
#14How are you holding session if every command is issues through cli? I assume this is essential for automation.
Re: Show HN: Webctl – Browser automation for agents based on CLI instead of MCP
#15Cool to see lots of people independently come to "CLIs are all you need". I'm still not sure if it's a short-term bandaid because agents are so good at terminal use or if it's part of a longer term trend but it's definitely felt much more seamless to me then MCPs. (my one of many contribution https://github.com/caesarnine/binsmith )
Nevertheless, I prefer the CLI for other reasons: it is built for humans and is much easier to debug.
Re: Show HN: Webctl – Browser automation for agents based on CLI instead of MCP
#16Cool to see lots of people independently come to "CLIs are all you need". I'm still not sure if it's a short-term bandaid because agents are so good at terminal use or if it's part of a longer term trend but it's definitely felt much more seamless to me then MCPs. (my one of many contribution https://github.com/caesarnine/binsmith )
MCP let's you hide secrets from the LLM
Re: Show HN: Webctl – Browser automation for agents based on CLI instead of MCP
#17Re: Show HN: Webctl – Browser automation for agents based on CLI instead of MCP
#18How are you holding session if every command is issues through cli? I assume this is essential for automation.
A background daemon holds the session state between different CLI calls. This daemon is started automatically on the first webctl call and auto-closes after a timeout period of inactivity to save resources.
Re: Show HN: Webctl – Browser automation for agents based on CLI instead of MCP
#19At this point I'm fully down the path of the agent just maintaining his own tools. I have a browser skill that continues to evolve as I use it. Beats every alternative I have tried so far.
Re: Show HN: Webctl – Browser automation for agents based on CLI instead of MCP
#20At this point I'm fully down the path of the agent just maintaining his own tools. I have a browser skill that continues to evolve as I use it. Beats every alternative I have tried so far.
Plus, now it is personal software... just keep asking it to improve the skill based on you usage. Bake in domain knowledge or business logic or whatever you want.
I'm using this for e2e testing and debugging Obsidian plugins and it is starting to understand Obsidian inside and out.