Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: Quibbler – A critic for your coding agent that learns what you want

github.com

11–20 of 29 posts

Re: Show HN: Quibbler – A critic for your coding agent that learns what you want

#13
post #5

hey HN! happy to answer any questions this kind of tool is especially useful in longer running tasks to enforce your intent without having to check in on your agent all the time

Can users stack Quibblers, so Quibbler 2 corrects Quibbler 1 if, say, it fabricates an issue in the code it's reviewing? If so, have you found an optimum number of Quibblers for the Quibbler stack? Also, might users form a Quibbler council such that multiple Quibblers review the same thing and form a consensus before proceeding?

I love the pixel-perfect precision with which this comment is straddling the Poe's Law line.

That aside I also love the concept of Quibbler Council and I'd get a kick out of seeing it in action.

Re: Show HN: Quibbler – A critic for your coding agent that learns what you want

#16

Is an anthropic api key really necessary? A major roadblock for taking a test drive. Already have a Claud Max subscription but an anthropic api key still need at least 5$/mon extra.

Sounds like video streaming services…

Re: Show HN: Quibbler – A critic for your coding agent that learns what you want

#18
post #10
post #6

> We’ve found Quibbler useful in preventing agents from: 1) fabricating results without running commands What a world we've created for ourselves

Next step is critics for the critics.

Until they reach critical mass.

Re: Show HN: Quibbler – A critic for your coding agent that learns what you want

#19

Is an anthropic api key really necessary? A major roadblock for taking a test drive. Already have a Claud Max subscription but an anthropic api key still need at least 5$/mon extra.

You could use the prompts in the code to create a Claude Code sub-agent[1], which would do the same thing without an API key

1. https://docs.claude.com/en/docs/claude-code/sub-agents

Post reply on HN