Interesting, but I think part of what made Classic Mac OS' spatial Finder work is that every folder only ever had a single window associated with it (similar to how in the physical world, spaces like folders and drawers only have a singular location) and opening a folder opens that window. It feels a touch strange to apply spatial logic to an Explorer-style navigator file manager.
Show HN: Re-Implementing the macOS Spatial Finder
11–20 of 38 posts
Re: Show HN: Re-Implementing the macOS Spatial Finder
#12Re: Show HN: Re-Implementing the macOS Spatial Finder
#13Re: Show HN: Re-Implementing the macOS Spatial Finder
#14Interesting, but I think part of what made Classic Mac OS' spatial Finder work is that every folder only ever had a single window associated with it (similar to how in the physical world, spaces like folders and drawers only have a singular location) and opening a folder opens that window. It feels a touch strange to apply spatial logic to an Explorer-style navigator file manager.
I see. While making this I found that if you hide the Finder sidebar and toolbar (both are options in the menu), then your scenario plays out. In a way it’s nicer than the video on my github.
It's also missing the open folder indicator that the Classic Finder had, where folders that had their window open somewhere had a different icon (filled with a stipple pattern). This is a bigger problem than it sounds like, particularly with OS X having multiple desktops and making it easier to lose windows.
Re: Show HN: Re-Implementing the macOS Spatial Finder
#15That's quite a caveat. The reason for it is:
> size and position are stored in a hidden .framedata.json file in that folder. When a folder is opened, this file is used to restore its state.
Couldn't this information be stored centrally in the user's home for any folders opened/moved/sized, avoiding this limitation?
Re: Show HN: Re-Implementing the macOS Spatial Finder
#16> Only folders inside the Documents folder are affected. That's quite a caveat. The reason for it is: > size and position are stored in a hidden .framedata.json file in that folder. When a folder is opened, this file is used to restore its state. Couldn't this information be stored centrally in the user's home for any folders opened/moved/sized, avoiding this limitation?
Re: Show HN: Re-Implementing the macOS Spatial Finder
#17Re: Show HN: Re-Implementing the macOS Spatial Finder
#18I don't think Spatial Finder is as useful as it once was. The reason is that these web interfaces block the whole screen, so I generally need to move the browser to the side, beep open a finder window, drag the file in, move the browser back, etc. What I would really like to have back from those days is to drag a folder to the bottom of the screen and have it turned into a little tab, so I can have a "CS602" tab for…
Re: Show HN: Re-Implementing the macOS Spatial Finder
#19I don't think Spatial Finder is as useful as it once was. The reason is that these web interfaces block the whole screen, so I generally need to move the browser to the side, beep open a finder window, drag the file in, move the browser back, etc. What I would really like to have back from those days is to drag a folder to the bottom of the screen and have it turned into a little tab, so I can have a "CS602" tab for…
Why not put an accordion folder in the dock?
Everything seems to be at the point where you want to invite the developer over, get him drunk, and make him swear at his own product until he agrees the experience is not great. Of course there is no "the developer" anymore.
Re: Show HN: Re-Implementing the macOS Spatial Finder
#20I don't think Spatial Finder is as useful as it once was. The reason is that these web interfaces block the whole screen, so I generally need to move the browser to the side, beep open a finder window, drag the file in, move the browser back, etc. What I would really like to have back from those days is to drag a folder to the bottom of the screen and have it turned into a little tab, so I can have a "CS602" tab for…
From my perspective the desktop metaphor UX was obsolete the moment it was conceived of. All anyone has to do is look at the physical desks of a thousand random people and it should be immediately obvious how little value there is in recreating that chaos.