Show HN: Yet another memory system for LLMs
11–20 of 51 posts
Re: Show HN: Yet another memory system for LLMs
#12I see stuff like this, and I really have to wonder if people just write software with bloat for the sake of using a particular library.
Re: Show HN: Yet another memory system for LLMs
#13Re: Show HN: Yet another memory system for LLMs
#14>MCP server (requires Boost) I see stuff like this, and I really have to wonder if people just write software with bloat for the sake of using a particular library.
Re: Show HN: Yet another memory system for LLMs
#15Re: Show HN: Yet another memory system for LLMs
#16>MCP server (requires Boost) I see stuff like this, and I really have to wonder if people just write software with bloat for the sake of using a particular library.
Re: Show HN: Yet another memory system for LLMs
#17>MCP server (requires Boost) I see stuff like this, and I really have to wonder if people just write software with bloat for the sake of using a particular library.
Re: Show HN: Yet another memory system for LLMs
#18>MCP server (requires Boost) I see stuff like this, and I really have to wonder if people just write software with bloat for the sake of using a particular library.
It’s an optional component.
What do you want the OP to do?
MCP may not be strictly necessary but it’s straight in line with the intent of the library.
Are you going to take shots at llama.cpp for having an http server and a template library next?
Come on. This uses conan, it has a decent cmake file. The code is ok.
This is pretty good work. Dont be a dick. (Yeah, ill eat the down votes, it deserves to be said)
Re: Show HN: Yet another memory system for LLMs
#19Re: Show HN: Yet another memory system for LLMs
#20I'm puzzled - where are the header files?